1. -markie-

    -markie-

    Messages:
    560
    Name:
    MG
    Edit My Images:
    No
    i'd edge slightly for the 35mm, but both should work pretty well. Plus you can always sort the distortion out in PP anyway?
     
  2. Eddie1

    Eddie1

    Messages:
    688
    Name:
    Ed
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I've always favoured the 35mm myself, and staying with the same lens you start to see the scenes as it sees them.
    When I use zooms I'm all over the place.
    Using a prime keeps me focussed and produces better results imo.
     
  3. Slyelessar

    Slyelessar

    Messages:
    703
    Name:
    Slyelessar
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I think 44mm (FF) is technically what the eye sees if you are really getting into it.

    However, the 35mm & 50mm (and equivalents) are great for street photography. I have used both, but really love using a 24mm for street photography.

    The 35mm allows you to get more into the frame, but if you are uncomfortable getting close then the 50mm is great.

    50mm (film):
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/33585906372/in/album-72157679521643742/

    24mm (film):
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/33437533263/in/album-72157679521643742/

    40mm (film):
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/33342694300/in/album-72157679521643742/

    And a coupe digitals:

    35mm (52m equivalent):
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/33817104170/in/datetaken-public/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/34492909325/in/datetaken-public/
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/132637112@N06/34492907945/in/datetaken-public/


    All photographs are candid :)
     
    dancook likes this.
  4. Slyelessar

    Slyelessar

    Messages:
    703
    Name:
    Slyelessar
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Tend to find being closer to subject (portrait) gives more dramatic effect 9/10. Nothing worse than when a street photo has been taken from miles away and is just a shot of a head imo - not that it doesn't work, but if someone has a body of work is like that it is off putting for me. 50mm is a cool focal length though (35mm is 50mm eq on APS-C).

    Different tastes and all that jazz.
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2017
    redsnappa likes this.
  5. dancook

    dancook

    Messages:
    4,935
    Edit My Images:
    No
    These are FF equivalents, and some cropping may have been involved.

    All with strangers, who did not know I took the shot

    Personally, I'm currently sticking with the 28mm of my Leica Q for street


    21mm

    [​IMG]she waits.. by dancook1982, on Flickr

    28mm

    [​IMG]Rawr by dancook1982, on Flickr

    [​IMG]L1070541 by dancook1982, on Flickr

    35mm

    [​IMG]Nun by dancook1982, on Flickr

    [​IMG]_DSC2955 by dancook1982, on Flickr

    55mm

    [​IMG]Bridget Jones - revisited by dancook1982, on Flickr

    90mm

    [​IMG]Untitled by dancook1982, on Flickr

    [​IMG]DSC03214 by dancook1982, on Flickr
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2017
    desf, Mintchocs, FishyFish and 2 others like this.
  6. ChrisHeathcote

    ChrisHeathcote

    Messages:
    3,682
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It depends on how you want to shoot and what you want the main focus to be. Personally I prefer 35mm (full frame) as I like to have more of the environment, if you were wanting to capture the individuals and a bit of the surroundings then 50mm. However I tend to use 85mm for this
     
  7. ChrisHeathcote

    ChrisHeathcote

    Messages:
    3,682
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Stunning shots Dan, although I think number 2 spotted you . Like the PP too (y)
     
    dancook likes this.
  8. dancook

    dancook

    Messages:
    4,935
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Her expression was nothing to do with me :)
     
    ChrisHeathcote likes this.
  9. hudster1969

    hudster1969

    Messages:
    20
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Have to agree with Chris, cracking pictures. I like the last two but the nun one is my favourite and just looks right in B&W.

    I just bought a 28mm to try for Street photography, so far most of mine have been with 35 - 80mm kit lens and a couple with zoom 80 - 200mm for distance shots.
     
  10. robertdc

    robertdc

    Messages:
    6
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I definitely prefer the 28mm focal length for street. Some people say you need a lot of confidence to get in close but, personally I don’t find that. Somehow it feels more natural to me and there’s less need to point the camera directly at the subject. I shoot with the Ricoh GR and the Leica Q, both of which are 28mm (equivalent on the Ricoh). The other great thing is the responsiveness. The Leica has incredibly fast autofocus - which is amazing given its contrast detect only - and the Ricoh has snap focus which is like a really handy way of zone focusing.

    When I try shooting with a longer focal length, i.e. 50 mm and even 35mm to a lesser extent, I find I’m having to move the camera about more to get the framing right and that makes me more noticeable.

    The only drawback with 28mm is that it can distort straight lines a bit, especially if you’re shooting from an angle. I’d still strongly recommend it though!
     
  11. IanD

    IanD

    Messages:
    771
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Just reading through this thread as it's been bumped, and saw this quote from StreetSnapper.

    I'll happily start another thread if someone says so, as I don't want to detract from the OP's thread, but was wondering what this means. I understand to a certain extent, the non-exploitative quote for instance as in making monetary or notoriety gain from the images, but the voyeuristic one?
     
  12. Nod

    Nod Kronus

    Messages:
    30,768
    Name:
    Nod (NOT Ethel!!!)
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    35mm - MF is too bulky (but a WLF can be more discreet than having a camera to the eye.)
     
  13. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    7,564
    Name:
    Hi Ho Silver away !
    Edit My Images:
    No
    When I had a Nikon, I had the 35mm 1.8 and what a cracking lens it was. Now I am all Fuji I have the XF 35mm f2 and that is a great lens to use, as you can get up close or have some of the BG in :)
     
  14. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    7,564
    Name:
    Hi Ho Silver away !
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Craikeybaby likes this.
  15. Devoted Lens

    Devoted Lens

    Messages:
    51
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I assume he is referring to it not being for some kind of sadistic, weird, curious pleasure? Just a guess, does seem a little random. Many photos are purely for the art/pleasure of it, even if in this instance it is capturing a potentially unpleasant experience.
     
  16. aliengrove

    aliengrove

    Messages:
    483
    Name:
    Jon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I don't do much street photography, but when I do, I prefer 28mm over any other focal length, probably because most of my street photography has been with my (now defunct) Ricoh GR. 28mm tends to include more of the background, which can add a lot to a street image imo.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2018
  17. Callumz

    Callumz

    Messages:
    32
    Name:
    Callum
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'd say full frame equivalent of 50mm is best for street photography or 35mm on crop sensor.
    However, as always, the best lens is whichever one you will take plenty of photos with and enjoy using!
     
  18. Chipper

    Chipper

    Messages:
    1,821
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I think I read an article by Joel M.... who described the benefits of a variety of focal lengths. I will see if I can find it.
     
  19. jamesev

    jamesev

    Messages:
    666
    Name:
    Jamesev
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I quite like the 28mm f1.4 for street
     
  20. IainDunbar

    IainDunbar

    Messages:
    42
    Name:
    Iain
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    35 all the way for me, I like the feeling of getting closer
     
  21. ihasa

    ihasa

    Messages:
    197
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Like RobertDC suggests, when you use a wide angle lens you can be quite close to your subject and although they may be aware you are taking photos, they may not realise they are in the frame. I think it's nicer to be close to your subjects. If they really have a problem with being included in a photo you will be able to tell. With a long lens it does sometimes feel a bit unfair and 'stealing' pictures of people. Supertele grab shots of people rarely look good IMHO as you don't feel immersed in the scene with the subject. Sometimes I see those shots and think it would be more ethical (and better in terms of results) if the photographer found a model to shoot.
     
  22. ashtennisguru

    ashtennisguru

    Messages:
    1,165
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I'm shooting my street work at 35mm (on a Fuji X-T3) pretty much exclusively at the moment (and thoroughly enjoying it)
     
  23. Craikeybaby

    Craikeybaby

    Messages:
    5,544
    Name:
    Lewis
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    When I shot on Canon FF my fast prime was always a 50mm, now I am looking to get a fast prime for my Fuji system I am torn between 35mm (50mm equivalent) and 23mm (35mm equivalent). It will be mainly used for street and the odd landscape when I am travelling light, so leaning towards the 23mm.
     
  24. G4lly

    G4lly

    Messages:
    32
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I tend to like the 23mm / 35mm equivalent field of view of my X100F and use this focal length with my other ASPC camera, which I recently switched to an XT3. Having said that, I occasionally take a 35mm (50 equiv) and 50mm (75mm equiv ff) if I can't be bothered engaging people as much and want to stand back a bit.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice