- Messages
- 131
- Name
- A
- Edit My Images
- No
Speaking of VAR; I'm still mystified why Gakpo's goal was dissallowed against Villa. The argument was that VVD was in an offside position in the build up, but he wasn't 'affecting play' at that moment, and when he passed back, the ball had actually come off a Villa player. Ergo, not offside. I understand the decision, but I don't agree with it (of course!). It's an 'interpretation, but we've seen plenty of examples where such goals have been given. There's nothing wrong with VAR, it's overall positive, but there's often hideous inconsistency in the decision making by the humans officiating. . I think what it is doing, is exposing the rules as too vague. But that wasn't offside.
Oh and then there's the foul on Hendo that should have been a pen. Defender knees him in the back of the leg!
And then there's Ming's foul on Gakpo. Spurs fans will scream about Jota and Skipp (whilst conveniently ignoring Skipp's earlier dangerous tackle on Diaz, which could easily have been a leg-breaker); difference is, Jota went for, and got the ball. Skipp actually headed Jota's foot. Mings came in late with a proper dangerous chest height tackle, studs out, that left physical damage. You can't do that. Red card every single day. Villa got away with that one.
Oh and then there's the foul on Hendo that should have been a pen. Defender knees him in the back of the leg!
And then there's Ming's foul on Gakpo. Spurs fans will scream about Jota and Skipp (whilst conveniently ignoring Skipp's earlier dangerous tackle on Diaz, which could easily have been a leg-breaker); difference is, Jota went for, and got the ball. Skipp actually headed Jota's foot. Mings came in late with a proper dangerous chest height tackle, studs out, that left physical damage. You can't do that. Red card every single day. Villa got away with that one.
Last edited: