So basically apart from missing no blackout jonney and Riz wasted their money
Exactly
So basically apart from missing no blackout jonney and Riz wasted their money
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]It's going to take 10 years to charge via usb.
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
I'll take the 2300GBP savings over a charger anyway bro lol
Basically the A9 is almost pointless then
For the target market of the A9 (sports shooters) the bigger buffer alone is a big enough selling point.
Though for anyone that doesn't need to fire off 100 raw frames in a row I'd pick the A7III and buy some nice lenses (or go on a holiday lmao)
The eye AF is definitely better.
Better than the A9?For the target market of the A9 (sports shooters) the bigger buffer alone is a big enough selling point.
Though for anyone that doesn't need to fire off 100 raw frames in a row I'd pick the A7III and buy some nice lenses (or go on a holiday lmao)
The eye AF is definitely better.
I feel a D750 coming in the adsBetter than the A9?
Better than the A9?
Yes. 100%Better than the A9?
Yes. 100%
The A9 when following an eye has a noticeable lag. The A7III follows much quicker.
Yeah true. It definitely holds the eye better. Maybe the extra contrast points?The catch is wether that translates into a higher hit rate or not... during a burst.
I think Joe Bowman would have chosen the A7iiiThe catch is wether that translates into a higher hit rate or not... during a burst.
I feel sorry for the sado's who make the videos. Informing that the camera comes in a little black bag and the power cable is wrapped with an electrical tieI always wondered who watched unboxing videos
Well the A7riii with Canon 70-200mm is not a good combo to say the least, I think I'd get more hits with my EM1
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fBVzxS3k2Y&t=194s
Very underestimated, I use one on my A6000 and am very pleased.Does anyone have the 28? I'd look to invest in that to keep the camera size down for smaller projects.
That does not look good.
Although in the comments it does state that the manual says that with adapted lens it only tracks the first shot.
For the target market of the A9 (sports shooters) the bigger buffer alone is a big enough selling point.
Though for anyone that doesn't need to fire off 100 raw frames in a row I'd pick the A7III and buy some nice lenses (or go on a holiday lmao)
The eye AF is definitely better.
Perhaps a couple of people round hereEdit: was a little harsh. Do people really need to fire off 100 raw shots in a row?
No, which one?Did you watch the video I posted?
CoolYes. 100%
The A9 when following an eye has a noticeable lag. The A7III follows much quicker.
Not looking at that video. Although that was the metabones, not the MC-11Works just like native and as fast... according to some.
No, which one?
Cool
Not looking at that video. Although that was the metabones, not the MC-11
The shutter sound also feels/sounds very different to the A9 and A7r2.
The shutter sound also feels/sounds very different to the A9 and A7r2.
In what ways?
I wouldnt want to admit defeat either mateLol you guys!
I won’t be selling my Sony A9 anytime soon
Good or bad?
I wouldnt want to admit defeat either mate
Good. Not sure how to explain it. Feels very very responsive and fast
Sony's UK website says charger in the box
https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/interchangeable-lens-cameras/ilce-7m3-body-kit/specifications
AC Adaptor AC-UUE12
is it a noisy mf?