- Messages
- 8,499
- Name
- Trevor
- Edit My Images
- No
Nice line up. Those 3 would be my dream setup. But it really depends on what/how you shoot. Personally the 35 is my most used focal length.
The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!
- Thread starter woof woof
- Start date
Nice line up. Those 3 would be my dream setup. But it really depends on what/how you shoot. Personally the 35 is my most used focal length.
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Of course there can be sample variation, but I've seen similar results posted. I guess when you get that extra reach for 2/3 of the cost there has to be compromises, but I guess it depends on what you're shooting. For birders the 200-600mm will likely make more sense as you need all the reach you can get and crop heavily.well if this is just how the lens is, then LCE might not humour me with a refund
In an ideal world I'd have a 400mm f2.8 and use TC's when I need to
- Messages
- 23,521
- Name
- Toni
- Edit My Images
- No
As said, nice outfit. Yes, I'd have thought the 35 would sit well with them, depending on what you shoot.
OP
woof woof
I like a nice Chianti
- Messages
- 39,660
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I had a choice, sit in the car for an hour or go for a walk and as this could be the only hour I have free I was going for a walk no matter what
Of course there can be sample variation, but I've seen similar results posted. I guess when you get that extra reach for 2/3 of the cost there has to be compromises, but I guess it depends on what you're shooting. For birders the 200-600mm will likely make more sense as you need all the reach you can get and crop heavily.
In an ideal world I'd have a 400mm f2.8 and use TC's when I need to
Getting a refund
OP
woof woof
I like a nice Chianti
- Messages
- 39,660
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I think 24 and 50mm make a nice pair if you want to head out with just two lenses but if I was going to take just one lens it might be a 35mm. 35 and either 24 or 50mm maybe don't make such a good pair, imo. Three (relatively) big fat lenses would be a bit too much for me to take out all together but if your bag is big enough and your neck and back can stand the strain then why not?
- Messages
- 5,274
- Name
- Lee
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hmm think you have
[url=https://flic.kr/p/2kY7HpD]Milky Way from Pen yr Ole Wen by Terence Rees, on Flickr[/URL]
Milky Way from Pen yr Ole WenIt appears I stand corrected. Certainly not a common lens for it but if it works.....
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I bought a 200-600 yesterday morning to photograph a competitive cricket match, I was not happy with the sharpness when I checked at 100% - but perhaps it was atmospheric disturbance, so this morning I did some 'proper' tests. Shot from the same position, cropped to match (600mm has advantage in cropping)
I discovered the 200-600 @ 600mm f6.3 is not as sharp as the 100-400 f5.6 even after it's been cropped in to match - which I assume means I could have shot the cricket on my 100-400 and go sharper images even if I needed to crop.
near = about 10 feet
far = about 20 feet
A1108456 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
A1108454 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
A1108458 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
A1108459 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
with these kind of results i'd be better off shooting 100-400 and cropping.
you do not fully explain how you got these images i.e. testing method could you please explain?
Ideally what you would do is.
shoot 100-400mm in APS-C mode if you wish. don't change position, shoot with 200-600mm from same position (FF mode). downsize your result from 200-600mm to the resolution of you 100-400mm i.e. about 21mp if its the A1. then compare crops.
If 100-400mm is still fair bit sharper then you have a
it doesn't really. I had 100-400+1.4x and 200-600mm. 200-600mm is definitely better unless you have a bad copy of 200-600mm.
Last edited:
Fuji Dave
I'm in Clover
- Messages
- 22,088
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
Hmm think you have
[url=https://flic.kr/p/2kY7HpD]
Lovely image, I was testing out my telescope at 3am this morning and was blown away at the view of what ever I was looking at.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I personally would buy something like 135GM, but don't really know what you shoot so its hard to suggest.
they are all good lenses... and you can crop your 24mm to 35mm and still have plenty pixels left.
Raymond Lin
I am Groot
- Messages
- 10,030
- Name
- Raymond
- Edit My Images
- No
A1, 25GM and 50GM.
I wouldn't go straight to the 35GM for a more even focal coverage, I would go for an 85 or 135 next but honestly......you should know what you like and thus what you need.
I wouldn't go straight to the 35GM for a more even focal coverage, I would go for an 85 or 135 next but honestly......you should know what you like and thus what you need.
I sat on a bench, rest my arms on a table with the camera and shot at 1/2000th - I changed lenses and took the shot, wide open and fully zoomed.
I then cropped to the same portion on the suncream bottle, so obviously the 400mm is cropped more heavily.
Yet it is much sharper, particularly when i moved the bottle further away and repeated.
I exported them to 1000px - so they are all downsized
Either way - it shows if I were to take the same shot from the same position, and crop the 100-400mm to match the reach of 600mm, it would be better in image quality.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 5,419
- Name
- Terry
- Edit My Images
- Yes
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
And this is part of the issue, different people get different results so it's always best to try for yourself. Of course this doesn't negate a bad copy, unless you try another one.
With regards to your method of testing sharpness I remember you suggesting this method to me, but I'm questioning which way would be best in the real world? In the real world you are only interested in the final image and if the 100-400mm looks better cropped than the 200-600mm uncropped then what does it matter if you downsize or not? I always output my images at full resolution so I don't see what benefit I'd get at exporting with a smaller file size/resolution?
Fuji Dave
I'm in Clover
- Messages
- 22,088
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- No
Yes it is amazing what can be seen, I'm really looking forward to putting one of my Sony cameras on the telescope and at over 1300 mm should be great.
You're all seeing the labels at the same size, so of course they've been downsized to match - the 400mm is a heavier crop, but it's got the same pixel dimension on your monitor right now.
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Yeah, I get that
. My point was though is for most users needs you want to see if you're going to be better off using the 100-400mm cropped, or the 200-600mm uncropped so no need to downsize to see which will work best for you in the real world I hope I'm making sense 
I've just been doing some more reading around and some are saying that the 200-600mm doesn't stand up as well with the higher MP cameras so maybe your A1 is showing it up more? The only way you'll know if yours is a lemon or not is by getting another, but if the next one is the same will they take it back?
I've seen some sharp examples of the lens, and I am certainly not getting that.
London Camera Exchange won't entertain it, the first thing they said as I came into the store was 'there's nothing wrong with that lens'
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Are you going to try one from somewhere else? Like you've just said I've seen some really good examples, and there's a lot of varying opinions on which is sharper. When I tried them both the 100-400mm was the better of the two, but now I'm questioning whether this was just sample variation too. TBH, either way I don't want the weight of the 200-600mm
Are you going to try one from somewhere else? Like you've just said I've seen some really good examples, and there's a lot of varying opinions on which is sharper. When I tried them both the 100-400mm was the better of the two, but now I'm questioning whether this was just sample variation too. TBH, either way I don't want the weight of the 200-600mm
No I'm not, I delivered the 200-600 shots to the client - for normal viewing they are acceptable, like when slightly off-focus image can be acceptable if viewed small enough.
I now know that the 100-400 cropped to match those images would have been better that what I have delivered, so I might as well stick with that for the occasional time I need the reach.
Like this image, does not stand up to to any zooming but it'll be ok!
cricket by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
yes it does matter because you will have a better reach as result of having a longer lens with good sharpness. if you are dismissing a lens based on bad testing method you are simply lying to yourself (which is fine by me and makes no difference to me but if that were the case you wouldn't be asking on this forum and I wouldn't be telling you otherwise
)if you are trying to establish if a lens is technically sound then you should test it appropriately.
yes it does matter because you will have a better reach as result of having a longer lens with good sharpness. if you are dismissing a lens based on bad testing method you are simply lying to yourself (which is fine by me and makes no difference to me but if that were the case you wouldn't be asking on this forum and I wouldn't be telling you otherwise
if you are trying to establish if a lens is technically sound then you should test it appropriately.
All I am testing is if the 200-600 lens is worth using instead of my 100-400, and it is not. Since I can crop the 400mm to match the 600mm with superior results.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
sounds like you might have a bad copy. While 100-400mm is tad bit sharper the difference is mainly in the corners than centre frame. In the "APS-C region" of the frame there is barely any difference IMO. So if 100-400mm cropped is better than 200-600mm then you do not have a good copy.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Its very hard to find a comparison it seems the closest I can find is these two sharpness measurements:
200-600mm sharpness measurements:
www.opticallimits.com
100-400mm sharpness measurements:
www.ephotozine.com
Even allowing for some differences in testing you can see that in the centre 200-600mm is mostly on similar levels @600mm to 100-400mm @400mm. So if you have good copies of both lenses, the 200-600mm should net you better results than cropping down from 100-400mm at the very least in the centre of the frame.
200-600mm sharpness measurements:
Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS - Review / Test Report - Analysis
Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS - Review / Test Report
www.opticallimits.com
100-400mm sharpness measurements:
Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G Master OSS Review
John Riley reviews the new Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 G Master OSS telephoto zoom lens for E Mount Sony cameras.
Even allowing for some differences in testing you can see that in the centre 200-600mm is mostly on similar levels @600mm to 100-400mm @400mm. So if you have good copies of both lenses, the 200-600mm should net you better results than cropping down from 100-400mm at the very least in the centre of the frame.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 4,695
- Name
- Laurence
- Edit My Images
- No
Do you not have any protection under the Consumer Rights Act? I don't think a retailer simply saying "there's nothing wrong with that lens" and rejecting your request for refund or replacement would stand up to legal scrutiny.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
LCE will take back bad copies and even cover return delivery for it.
Edit:
Ah it looks like it was bought directly from the store.... hmm.... may be it might be hard returning it for that reason then
Last edited:
- Messages
- 9,904
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- Yes
That sounds like they already knew something was wrong and were expecting you!
OP
woof woof
I like a nice Chianti
- Messages
- 39,660
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
The A7c, 6 months on...
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywBsFtltFwQ
My own opinion, and I accept that a lot of people love this camera, is that it's a missed opportunity to move away from the A6xxx layout and as one blogger said... as the whole internet says in union "add a front dial Sony." And then there's the EFCS, 1/4000 limit for the mechanical shutter and other things. In the unlikely event they go this way with the A7 series when mine konks I'll be buying something else, anything else.
My own opinion, and I accept that a lot of people love this camera, is that it's a missed opportunity to move away from the A6xxx layout and as one blogger said... as the whole internet says in union "add a front dial Sony." And then there's the EFCS, 1/4000 limit for the mechanical shutter and other things. In the unlikely event they go this way with the A7 series when mine konks I'll be buying something else, anything else.
- Messages
- 4,695
- Name
- Laurence
- Edit My Images
- No
A retail store still has obligations to the purchaser under the Consumer Rights Act.
Citizens Advice will help clarify things.
I bought instore yesterday morning, this morning I phoned ahead about the lens, emailed samples, and drove in to show them.
They did offer me a refund regardless of what they thought, not that they tested the lens.
I took the refund this morning
sorry you may have missed that post.
Raymond Lin
I am Groot
- Messages
- 10,030
- Name
- Raymond
- Edit My Images
- No
Then go for it, if you have the cash and want to plug the 35mm hole in your line up then it's the best. Considering what else you have, I would just get it.
Join the club.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Then go for it, if you have the cash and want to plug the 35mm hole in your line up then it's the best. Considering what else you have, I would just get it.
Join the club.
It is really the best 35mm lens I have used, then again I have never used the canon 35Lii. then againnmost 35mm f1.4 lenses I used on e-mount weren't great one way or the other.
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
But that’s what’s frying my noodle, surely if I want to know which is giving me the best final I want to compare the best resolution image that each way can provide, therefore if I’m downsizing the 200-600mm it’s not the best it can be?yes it does matter because you will have a better reach as result of having a longer lens with good sharpness. if you are dismissing a lens based on bad testing method you are simply lying to yourself (which is fine by me and makes no difference to me but if that were the case you wouldn't be asking on this forum and I wouldn't be telling you otherwise
if you are trying to establish if a lens is technically sound then you should test it appropriately.
- Messages
- 15,857
- Edit My Images
- Yes
you are correct, downsizing 200-600mm is not the best it can be. I wouldn't have kept it if I had to downsize to get a half-decent result.
But if we are technically comparing lenses to establish how good or bad individual copies are then its best to do it in as best method as possible to understand the full extent of the differences.
Once you have established a lens is good or bad (copy) then its really down to the user. otherwise we are just debating over possibilities. basically nail down one of the variables, make sure its up to the job technically speaking then you can concentrate on your art and skill. otherwise return it.
Last edited:
Raymond Lin
I am Groot
- Messages
- 10,030
- Name
- Raymond
- Edit My Images
- No
Until I put the Sony through in a proper environment I still put the Canon L mk2 the best, but not quite when adapted on the Sony mount though.
- Messages
- 23,612
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Ok so we’re looking at different things here I think
- Messages
- 95
- Name
- Dauda
- Edit My Images
- Yes
So I take it the 35mm GM is just as good as predicted? It was my most used focal length on my D5200, though that was cropped. After recently getting an A7iii - 85mm is definitely a keeper for me. I am liking the Tamron 28-75 but I am wondering if I would prefer a prime 35mm instead. And then complete the collection with a wide prime and a 135mm or above later down the line.
Off to Wales next week and hopefully a dark park. Bet you it will be cloudy lol.
Edit - in fact, any recommendations for dark sites in or near Ceredigion?
Off to Wales next week and hopefully a dark park. Bet you it will be cloudy lol.
Edit - in fact, any recommendations for dark sites in or near Ceredigion?
Last edited: