Duncan - they have taken my breath away. They are so strong I cannot decide on a single favourite. I am really drawn towards the lighthouse shot with the path leading up to it, the island with the sun behind the clouds, the dynamic range of the moonlit bay with the stars and the texture/form of the layers of stone in the cliff photo.
In regards to your statement; its such a personal thing that I couldn't even start to offer you any advice. What I can comment on is how your images strongly reflect your philosophy.
"The solitude and beauty of isolated landscapes gives me a profound sense of inner peace." - Although the set really speaks volumes of isolation and solitude I think that the lighthouse shots add a human landscape element. This gives some diversity to the set. I would say that lighthouses must be one of the strongest examples of humans most isolated influence on landscape.
"As I walk through remote locations I notice areas of limitless texture and beauty. My apprehension of what could go wrong in such hostile environments is reflected in much of my work." - I think the set has some excellent texture on offer. From the wonderful smooth time lapsed shot of the pebbles on the beach through the textured black and white sand right up to the hard edged photo of the granite ridge. Regarding your apprehension - I think the rainbow shot does this for me - something "lost boys" about standing on a cliff edge and dropping into the mist.
After your suggestion I have been reading up on the RPS distinction criterion. I may have misunderstood it but I wonder if its worth considering you may have too many shots of the same island. I count three that appear to be shot from an identical position. Each has its own message to convey but I seemed to get the impression that it may weaken your chance if you have more than two "similar" shots?
Only other thing is that could the shot of the sand be considered an odd one out the set? I say this not because it doesnt support the texture statement but because to look at it in relation to the rest may isolate it as somewhat abstract.
Anyway hope some of those comments help, thank you for sharing them, and I look forward to seeing your ideas develop
Wow! Thanks for putting so much thought into your response.
You are right about lighthouses; that's very eloquently put!
For the panel, I'm wanting to select strikingly simple compositions; so
this lighthouse is a stronger contender than the one with the path. The
lighthouse with the path is an odd image as I've always loved that image but surprisingly few other people feel moved by it; I think I'm being influenced by my memories of taking it; a perfect summer evening with Dolphins playing in the sea beneath me.
The
rainbow shot is one of the few images that's a definite for the panel, so long as it fits with the final layout. It's a Broken Spectre and it's a treat seeing them as well defined as this one.
Several X10 images are on the top contender list for my panel, including
this stormy seascape which looks great big as the textures shine through.
My previous compact camera get an honourable mention too!
This one comes from my old LX3, which this is an example of where it produced a cracking image at the right quality, but this happened far less frequently than the X10. This image has needed Photoshop to paint in texture to some overexposed clouds that the X10 might have got away with.
Regards "similar" shots....
What they want to see evidence of diversity illustrating that you have mastered your camera.
If you think you can do that then it probably isn't a problem.
An example of what they are trying to avoid is a studio with a succession of different models using the same lighting set up; the additional images tell them nothing more about the photographer's capabilities.
The Travel and Contemporary Categories are frequently about a single location, so that's not a problem.
One of the F panels I saw recently documented homeless people, it had the same subjects and locations reused in different shots, but wasn't a problem as the story being told by each images was very different.
The challenge is that LRPS doesn't have categories; which is where some proper advice is needed. Remember that they are after evidence you are in control of the image making process, and your images are doing that!
The guidelines also say properly exposed, avoid bleached highlights and blocked in shadows and should be sharp where they need to be sharp - but I've seen an L panel that blew this away as the graphic composition was so strong nothing else mattered and it was a very comfortable L pass. As said earlier - best to get advice from the RPS.
I've got a suspicion that a chat with the Distinctions organisers would be the best way forward. The Distinctions Workshops they run often offer mentors to help with this sort of decision and if you play your cards right, they might put you in touch with one of them.
Also cheers to Ed - He's right
The words are still very rough; but I'm not worried about that as I need to set the theme so I can start selecting images to support my statement.
Some of the paragraphs are rather mixed up at the moment.
There are three things I want to convey:
- where I came from and why it motivates me
- the contrast of beauty and danger in these remote places
- what I'm looking for in my images
I know I haven't got the words right yet; but at least they are getting close enough that I can gather my images and start laying out my panel.
My fist attempt at a panel (pre-statement) was really just a collection of my favourite images. Even though it was a bit mixed, it looked great; but it would have been impossible to write a statement about them. About 1/3 of them didn't come close to fitting my statement and have now been discarded.