I do have a flatscreen TV, but I only got it in 2014 as the Panasonic 100 htz CRT one I had before it refused to die and was too good to throw out! A bit like those legacy lenses really.
As for waiting for your film/prints to come back from the lab, that's one of the best bits, it can be like Christmas morning every few weeks! That feeling of anticipation as to what you're going to get. So come on in, the developer's lovely! Joking aside, quite a lot of people are either going back to film cameras or trying film photography for the first time, in addition to shooting digital. I find film slows me down, makes me think about what I'm doing and that has improved my photography over the last couple of years, as well as adding another dimension and interest to my hobby.
So next time you've spotted a legacy lens bargain, why not grab the original film camera to go with it while they're still fairly cheap and join in the retro fun.
As for legacy lenses, there were some pretty good and cheap 3rd party lenses out there too in the 1980s (if you can find a good, fungus-free one these days). I did a bit of gig photography in the early 90s using a 80-200 f/4.5 Mitakon zoom lens on a Canon A1 and Kodak Ektar 1000 ISO film. I used -1 stop of exposure compensation to retain the atmosphere of the stage lighting (to stop the camera trying to make it look like daylight) which gave me a higher shutter speed, giving blur-free shots on the occasions when the stage lighting was bright enough. It was a case of grabbing a shot when I could! This technique seemed to work OK though, plus taking the film to a pro-lab for printing, so they didn't try to make the prints look like daylight! Here's a 1991 example scanned from a print, so you can decide if a Mitakon 80-200 zoom should go on the legacy glass hit-list.