Hi Paul
Close - like the concept and the trouble that you have taken with the set up and the lighting. My suggestion would be to have cloned out the highlights in the lens so that it was all a deep mysterious black.
Live - like others I am not sure of the necessity of the meter at the rear, but, as you wanted to include, then I would say that you have done well on the comp and the dof. Like the lighting on the wires but pity that the main light and the shadow falls on the neutral and earth, rather than the live- so that they are much more noticeable. Not like the old colours when the live would have been a nice popping red.
Live#2 - excellent handling of the subject
- good comp and dof highlighting the main cross. My be just a slight exposure boost
First - #1 - simple , colourful hits the mark. Nothing more to say
#2 - not really doing anything for me , sorry. Without the title i would not even have known your intention. Others have suggested more points of interest and perhaps that is why it does not work too well.
Play - another good concept. i was not sure of the desat of the Lego but i have read your thinking - perhaps in that case the iPod screen should be showing something with more vibrant colour because it too looks a bit muted.
#2 - good capture of your son - he really does look as if he is playing rather than posing. good colours and lighting
Small, small crit would be the light spill in the gap between arm and body which lands on the ipod screen.
Smooth - lovely light - I have mentioned before my likeness for northern European still life paintings and this really hits the mark. Two small points - one, i don't think that the reflection is necessary and without this the top of the pic could be larger than the bottom, and two (and this one is a bit weird) I would prefer the fruit on the LH third rather than the RH third. I know that the fruit aren't moving or looking but it is something to do with allowing space for the object to move or the subject to see IYSWIM
Bonkers