Thunderbird010
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,608
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Interesting, it’s ONLY the 100-400 IS that struggles with AF on the M3; the 200mm 2.8 L (even older) focus quickly and smoothly.. so perplexing! Any annoying! If anyone has a similar set up I’d be interested for a quick phone call for a diagnosis if they would be so kind!
Hmm maybe its with longer lens then...dratted shame!My 150-600 Sigma is same very slow, my ef and M lenses are fine with my M3
May as well wait for the M7....[emoji102]
Good stuff there.M7 or whatever it will be called is likely to be a FF body with an announcement due in the fourth quarter of 2018. The word according to Canon Rumours or more accurately Rumors, is at CR2 level indicating that the information is good and from a known source. I wonder how heavy and indeed pricey a FF mirrorless from Canon might be....
I too was looking at the M5 as a spare and because of the weight advantage but there seems to be one drawback for the event shooter in that there is a shutter lag which potentially means one may not always be able to capture an intended expression at the precise moment. That said, I haven't checked it out myself and there is an attractively wide range of pricing out there. Battery issues ( under 300 shots ) still persist though.
M7 or whatever it will be called is likely to be a FF body with an announcement due in the fourth quarter of 2018. ..
Looking at the evolution if the M system so far, it'd be cataclysmic, frankly I can't believe it.
In 5 years they've managed 2 half decent prime lenses still haven't produced the perfect M series body, which would be rangefinder in style, having incorrectly assumed that the only people interested in mirrorless weren't interested in 'proper' photography. They don't understand a camera needs a decent viewfinder, and that doesn't mean it has to look and feel like an SLR.
For me the great advantage of mirrorless is the smaller body, and APSC allows for matching fast small(ish) lenses. The Fuji system is perfect, but I don't want to own 2 lots of lenses.
I love my DSLRs, I'd considered an adaptor for Fuji, but have decided an M5 is a better bet.. not that I've committed yet.Phil,
I’m a Nikon man but drop my lenses onto to a Fuji -XT1 occasionally via an adapter. There is is also a Canon adapter. May be of interest.
https://fujilove.com/lens-adapters-a-look-at-your-options-coming-from-canon-or-nikon/
Good stuff there.
A FF M series could be interesting in engineering terms. To EF or not EF that is the question, whether a FF M lens series is nobler than the paucity of the current EF-M series......
Given Sony's alpha 7 full frame compact is shipping, Canon, once again, will be playing catch up. Unless they licence Sony's mount and lens range? More adapters?
We live in interesting times!
I mulled over the Fuji system long and hard and the dearth of M lenses is aggravating but the M5 was the deciding factor. I also went for the M6 but only for it's looks! The M6 with the 22mm pancake is a joy to use even without the EVF.I love my DSLRs, I'd considered an adaptor for Fuji, but have decided an M5 is a better bet.. not that I've committed yet.
Looking at the evolution if the M system so far, it'd be cataclysmic, frankly I can't believe it.
In 5 years they've managed 2 half decent prime lenses still haven't produced the perfect M series body, which would be rangefinder in style, having incorrectly assumed that the only people interested in mirrorless weren't interested in 'proper' photography. They don't understand a camera needs a decent viewfinder, and that doesn't mean it has to look and feel like an SLR.
For me the great advantage of mirrorless is the smaller body, and APSC allows for matching fast small(ish) lenses. The Fuji system is perfect, but I don't want to own 2 lots of lenses.
There is talk that no adapter will be needed on the FFM or that was how I read it .....
Which would remove the only remaining advantage of mirrorless, both body and lens size.
If the body doesn't use an adaptor, it needs the same size lens throat as their DSLR's, and uses the same size lenses, what's the point?
It sounds like an April fools joke to me.
Well after 2 weeks with the m10 I'm really impressed but I've sent it back. That's because I'm going to get a newer body was thinking the m5 or 6 and get the 11-22 55-200 and 22. Anyone using one of these as their main camera?
I'm looking at ordering the same, where did you order from if you don't mind me asking.Well I’ve now pushed the button on a M5 with 14-45 lens and adaptor package which should arrive tomorrow. I’ve been considering this purchase for some time now and decided that it represents the best solution for me to enable the use of the Canon lenses I’ve already got.
I’ve dabbled with Fuji but felt it didn’t offer me what I need for my wildlife photography without a huge investment, not something I’m in a position achieve at this time and also I feel more comfortable with lenses that I know and trust.
I’m hoping that I’ve now got my answer from reading through the previous posts here and am looking forward to my ‘M5’ future.
I'm looking at ordering the same, where did you order from if you don't mind me asking.
I've managed to order a 11-22 in excellent condition from mpb for £183 and a good 55-200 as well for £104. Traded the 15-45 in for £55 and get free pickup and delivery so saves £10 in delivery costs. I've used hdew before and that was where I was looking as they give 3 year warranty as well.Just to interject HDew are doing the M5 at £539 currently. I have never had any issues with them.
Picked up a couple of M lenses via the Bay incl the sliver finish EF-M 55-200 via a drop shipper in Dublin at £137 delivered. The 11-22 and 22mm pancake are difficult to source cheaply but are superb lenses.
The EF-M 28mm macrolite is about 3/5 and though I have one, I would not recommend it as for a little more cash you can get the sigma 30mm f/1.4 ART albeit requiring the adapter.
Steve
I got mine at Curry’s, £999.00 all in with free next day delivery. Amazon were £1299 for the same deal.I'm looking at ordering the same, where did you order from if you don't mind me asking.
Oh well, some you win I guess but my wife bought it for me as a Birthday / Xmas present so I’m not too worried.Just to interject HDew are doing the M5 at £539 currently. I have never had any issues with them.
Picked up a couple of M lenses via the Bay incl the sliver finish EF-M 55-200 via a drop shipper in Dublin at £137 delivered. The 11-22 and 22mm pancake are difficult to source cheaply but are superb lenses.
The EF-M 28mm macrolite is about 3/5 and though I have one, I would not recommend it as for a little more cash you can get the sigma 30mm f/1.4 ART albeit requiring the adapter.
Steve
Oops, that’s a great deal. I’d better not tell herE infinity who I have used in the past with no problems have it for £599. https://www.e-infin.com/uk/item/319...less_digital_camera_with_15-45mm_lens_(black)
I've managed to order a 11-22 in excellent condition from mpb for £183 and a good 55-200 as well for £104. Traded the 15-45 in for £55 and get free pickup and delivery so saves £10 in delivery costs. I've used hdew before and that was where I was looking as they give 3 year warranty as well.
That could be a plan, I really want the adaptor as well though so I can use my existing Canon lenses.If ordered on line I would send back and spend the extra £400 on lenses!!
That could be a plan, I really want the adaptor as well though so I can use my existing Canon lenses.
Does it still allow the lenses to AF?The Meike adapter works well and comes in around £20-25
My only concern is that canon seem to be making loads of bodies but not much in the way of lenses. I like the idea that you can get the adapters and use normal canon lenses but I would have expected more lenses in the M range being produced especially larger aperture lenses.
Does it still allow the lenses to AF?