RF 100-500 is £2900, wth!!
My thought exactly. I bought an RP a few months ago. I wanted a lightweight second body for use when I go for hikes. I have my 1DXII for everything else. I knew the R5, R6 and 100-500 were coming but I also suspected that the R5/R6 would be more than I wanted to pay and I was right.
I was intrigued by the 100-500. I thought that with the RP it would be great for taking out and about when I didn't want to lug the 1D and 500 f4 up a hill or for taking on holidays when photography wasn't the primary purpose of the trip.
At £2,900 though forget it. I can get the EF 100-400 for about £1,000 less than that so why would I pay £1,000 for an extra 100mm? Yes I get there are other advantages but not £1,000 worth for me.
Last edited: