- Messages
- 18,340
- Edit My Images
- No
new2me said:Cheers Ricardo
You are most welcome.
new2me said:Cheers Ricardo
Cheers Ricardo
Such as? Btw, it's not moon landing, it's moon LANDINGS. It happened 6 times.
I blame the Internet, there's a conspiracy theory for everything.
It's the 9/11 one that bakes my noodle. I think if you accept that's a us government conspiracy then there is zero hope for humanity.
I dont think the Clinton comparison is fair really
I think it is fair so just suck it up dude
Also Mission Control.Not just NASA. NASA didn't make the rockets, the rocket engines, the individual space craft, the space suits, develop the software and on and on and on.....
The other good one that I would like to have seen included would have been JFK...
All these people you are listing as needing to be involved in a cover up, did they all have access to every minute of the Apollo flights? Bill Kaysing claims that it is possible that the astronauts remained in Earth's orbit while a pre recorded 'landing' was aired.
[snip] Oswald was just a horrid little punk, a self serving, possibly publicity seeking little nobody who acted with no great thought or understanding of the enormity of his actions
Of such is cock up history, not conspiracy!
In which case, I'd ask what was tracked to and from the moon? And just who did leave those laser reflectors on the moon surface that are still used today?
Height of the Cold War, who knows what they were hiding/admitting?And how did the Soviets not see a Command/Service module in Earth orbit? And how would have have made the entire Lunar Excursion Module disappear?
So, how many people are involved in the tracking? Certainly not the likes of the suit makers
Maybe what was tracked was operated remotely and not manned; the placing of the reflectors could also have been left by these?
Height of the Cold War, who knows what they were hiding/admitting?
Maybe the LEM didn't actually land?
Thinking about it, that documentary came out when I was at Uni and was the last time I really talked about these conspiracies; back then, I knew nothing about photography but read up on the reasons for the anomalies and accepted them and the landing - before that, I thought it was fun to be skeptical
"Height of the Cold War". Exactly. Do you honestly believe one of the sides of that Cold War weren't tracking and watching every single thing the other side was sending into space?
You also seem to be suggesting now, that yes we had all the technology to go to the Moon and leave a laser reflector there. But not send men?
When the conspiracy claims are looked at, they quickly fall apart.
From what I understand (and it's not much) a large part of the cold war was deception, misinformation, counter intelligence and fear. Did they have the technology to determine exactly what the US sent to the moon?
Some people believe that the 1st landing was faked in order to get one up on the Ruskies, so maybe the reflectors were placed during a later genuine landing. I dont know which mission is credited with that task.
Yes, the claims do fall apart; it's not the only thing I agree with you on
But dont you find the people with the most stubborn point of view, are the people who believe in the outlandish conspiracies?
Take the clear evidence provided for evolution in the above mentioned Andrew Maxwell programme 'Conspiracy Road Trip: Creationism' and the quite stretched logic / thought process to counter the evidence. (particularly 45-50 minutes in).
The moon landings happened. Fact.
Can anyone explain this photo from apollo 12? It's Pete Conrad with two, yes, two astronauts in the visor...
The23rdman said:Can anyone explain this photo from apollo 12? It's Pete Conrad with two, yes, two astronauts in the visor...
You gotta stop trawling those conspiracy websites ;-)
You gotta stop trawling those conspiracy websites ;-)
Trawling? Dean writes them
A more indepth study of the photography courtesy of David Percy
[YOUTUBE]yo5w0pm24ic[/YOUTUBE]
No one can ignore all them questions, that was interesting.
Which questions need answering?
There are quite a few that intrigue me, but the top 3 have to be
1) the flag that is seen to be flapping in the wind
2) no stars seen from the moon in the images
3) no blast crater, where the module landed
There are quite a few that intrigue me, but the top 3 have to be
1) the flag that is seen to be flapping in the wind
2) no stars seen from the moon in the images
3) no blast crater, where the module landed