- Messages
- 5,812
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
My 2p - there are 2 types of posters, not just on here, I see the same elsewhere, in that they either welcome and accept critique, see it for what it is (i.e. suggestions on how to improve or reinforce the good points to a shot), take on board the parts they believe are relevant to them and utilise that new information in there future work.
These people tend to be quite easy to spot - they're the ones posting high quality work.
The other group just want the smoke up the jacksie and look for reasons to disagree or claim its too difficult to put the suggestions to use - i.e. on the bird forum you'll comment that a blue tits head is facing away from the camera and weakening the shot, and you'll invariably get a reply along the lines go 'oh, I'll ask it to pose better next time should I, it's wildlife it doesn't pose to order' or something similar. Surely a better response would be something along the lines of 'I see what you mean, its a common bird, I can go back for another go and I'll know what to aim for next time'.
This group are also fairly easy to spot as they produce the same shots they were shooting 2 years ago.
I fully accept my own style of crit isn't to everybody taste but I can honestly say I've never intended to upset anyone with my crit, but it does make me smile when people get defensive and offer excuses - even more so when its not the OP who has a whinge.
What crit is given in the sections I look at on here is very 'softly softly' compared to other forums, I honestly can't see why people throw their teddies out, we seem to be evolving into a nation of snowflakes, but each to their own.
Such a shame people stop posting because they don't like the responses to their shots - maybe try posting again, get the forums back up to speed and move into the first group I mentioned - what is there to lose, after all we're mainly a bunch of anonymous strangers on the internet!
Mike
These people tend to be quite easy to spot - they're the ones posting high quality work.
The other group just want the smoke up the jacksie and look for reasons to disagree or claim its too difficult to put the suggestions to use - i.e. on the bird forum you'll comment that a blue tits head is facing away from the camera and weakening the shot, and you'll invariably get a reply along the lines go 'oh, I'll ask it to pose better next time should I, it's wildlife it doesn't pose to order' or something similar. Surely a better response would be something along the lines of 'I see what you mean, its a common bird, I can go back for another go and I'll know what to aim for next time'.
This group are also fairly easy to spot as they produce the same shots they were shooting 2 years ago.
I fully accept my own style of crit isn't to everybody taste but I can honestly say I've never intended to upset anyone with my crit, but it does make me smile when people get defensive and offer excuses - even more so when its not the OP who has a whinge.
What crit is given in the sections I look at on here is very 'softly softly' compared to other forums, I honestly can't see why people throw their teddies out, we seem to be evolving into a nation of snowflakes, but each to their own.
Such a shame people stop posting because they don't like the responses to their shots - maybe try posting again, get the forums back up to speed and move into the first group I mentioned - what is there to lose, after all we're mainly a bunch of anonymous strangers on the internet!
Mike
Last edited: