out of the two - which do you think you prefer more ?
You're really enjoying that Voigtlander Immo...
An Aires Viscount. If you want more info, try this page: Japan takes over (cjs-classic-cameras.co.uk) There's plenty of other info on line if you look for it.My father in law's (very) old camera.
Yes but the 400bhp probably sounds nicer and has a quicker accelleration... possibly more comfortable too.This only shows that at a certain quality level differences do not matter much in real life. The same goes for cars: a 400hp car will not take you twice as fast to your
destination as a 200hp car ...
Yes but the 400bhp probably sounds nicer and has a quicker accelleration... possibly more comfortable too.
I see your post processing in the #2 has a more pronounced halo effect on the trees... were the processed with the same settings or you needed to recover a bit more sky in the second? Do you find you are processing the photos differently?
BTW - your sensor might need a clean (mine did loads of dirt/dust on it - hated clicking dots everywhere at f8+)
heh I was just curious whether they did the same/similar on the halos.Hi, I checked. Both pics got the same treatment in DXO, enhancing contrast and microcontrast. After checking I processed the pics again, everything flat in DXO now:
...
I am not trying to prove or disprove anything. At least I have found that the Lanthar is not a bad lens. And I do not have to throw my other 50s away ... --- )
I've borrowed a Leica M10M with 35mm (1st image)
Which 35 did you get? A 35 is the only hole in my lineup now that I have a 50 and 28. I have a tiny Voigtlander Ultron but after getting the 28mm Summicron I have a hankering for Leica glass.