- Messages
- 10,058
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- No
Sorry if I came across incorrectly? My post was probably more in reference to previous threads where there has been a clear divide between those who will post process their analogue scans and those who believe that the only 'true' result is straight from the film. My argument was that even the analogue masters like Adams would spend days in the darkroom 'post-processing' his analogue photographs to get the result he desired. While the darkroom is more physical and hands on, the techniques are simply employed digitally in Photoshop so what's the difference?
I'd never go so far as replacing parts of an image like the sky (whether shot on film of digital) but working on contrast/saturation/masking etc is perfectly 'acceptable' as far as I'd see.
I'd never go so far as replacing parts of an image like the sky (whether shot on film of digital) but working on contrast/saturation/masking etc is perfectly 'acceptable' as far as I'd see.