- Messages
- 3,688
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Where was that taken Fishyfish ?
Me again in 1974 ! My dad told me to go and play in the lake ,maybe I was a difficult child ! Par lake Cornwall Cosmic 35.
View attachment 121026
Ps I know it needs cropping or rescanning ?
That's nothing, it wasn't until I reached the age of 10 that I realised my name wasn't Stopit!My dad told me to go and play in the lake ,maybe I was a difficult child !
Did your Dad mean deeper?
Love the tones and clarity here.
Zeiss Mess-Ikonta 524/16 & Fujifilm Neopan 400.
FILM - Who watches the watchmen? by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Whereabouts is that taken, it looks familiar but I can't quite place it. Love the texture in the stones and heather, and the contrast with the bright sky is great
Great sense of scal in the first one Nige, and must be quite a view from the top of the wheel!
Hi Gary, did you expose this at box speed? I'd like to try out some Delta 3200 but haven't a clue whether I should rate at box speed or not.
A few details on developer would be good as wellHi Gary, did you expose this at box speed? I'd like to try out some Delta 3200 but haven't a clue whether I should rate at box speed or not.
Fab Gaz
Superb!
Hi Gary, did you expose this at box speed? I'd like to try out some Delta 3200 but haven't a clue whether I should rate at box speed or not.
A few details on developer would be good as well
Thanks Gareth. This is less grainy than I'm seeing with my HP5+ home devved in HC110, so was interested as I have a few rolls of 3200 in the fridge. I seem to recall Ilford DD-X being the preferred developer, and I bought some but never used it. Can't think it would be still OK in an unopened bottle after all this time, but might just try out of interest.T
Whatever Canadian Film Lab use to develop it. Mot of my stuff is lab dev and scan now, with only the odd roll of B&W done at home.
Not sure who Gary is? [emoji38] But I would have rated this at either 1000 or 1600 I think. That's where I usually am with Delta 3200.
Really lovely, Gareth. With the narrow depth of field I was assuming it must be 4x5, but I gather Ilford doesn't make 3200 in sheets. So, 120?
Thanks Gareth. This is less grainy than I'm seeing with my HP5+ home devved in HC110, so was interested as I have a few rolls of 3200 in the fridge. I seem to recall Ilford DD-X being the preferred developer, and I bought some but never used it. Can't think it would be still OK in an unopened bottle after all this time, but might just try out of interest.
Sorry I'm that used to Gaz being short for Gary that I just went on autopilot.
Do you have the lab pull your film in development down to 1000/ 1600 or do you have them develop as normal?
I know what you mean, the light was difficult and i don't think that has helped, I think I need a proper light meter and a lot more experience with filmI like the shot Chris but its a bit too grainy for me
Like this Fishy do you ever put your cameras down! Very admirable