- Messages
- 2,117
- Name
- Kevin
- Edit My Images
- No
I wonder if maybe a touch more depth of field would have been beneficial here? I like the seperation it's caused, but also wish more of the fungus on the log was in focus.
Bronica ETRSi
Zenzanon 75mm f/2.8
Fujifilm Provia 100
FILM - Log by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
I think it all gets a bit lost in the same colours too, almost to the 'what's that?' stage.
Yes, I hit the wrong button and sent without quoting! I've taken photos like that myself, they've looked great through the viewfinder!I'm assuming that this is in response to my photo and not Pete's images? If so, yes, I agree. The three-dimensionality of the scene has been disguised (camouflaged even) by the colours and textures. I've burnt in the edges of the frame a bit to try and help with this but it still blends together a lot.
That's very nice. I've not used TMax for a long time but that reminds me a lot of the look of XP2 for some reason.
Xpan | 45mm | Tmax 400 | XTOL(r) | Pakon
That's very nice. I've not used TMax for a long time but that reminds me a lot of the look of XP2 for some reason.
Doesn’t seem to suffer from pushing.Olympus OM-1
Zuiko 75-150mm f/4
Fujifilm Acros (Pushed to 400asa)
FILM - City skyline by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Doesn’t seem to suffer from pushing.
Olympus OM-1
Zuiko 75-150mm f/4
Fujifilm Acros (Pushed to 400asa)
FILM - City skyline by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Fine grain and pin sharp, impressive.
Xpan | 45mm | Tmax 400 | XTOL(r) | Pakon
Just a stab in the dark, but I'd hazard a guess as an XPan with 45mm lens, on TMax 400 and developed in Xtol; scanned with a Pakon scanner.