Show us yer film shots then!

I shall be there in 3 weeks, very excited.
 
Studio Session at Brentwood & District Photographic Club using BOWENS lights and MY YONGNUO Wireless Trigger in Camera Hot Shoes ! I used 2015 dated ILFORD DELTA 100 in my 1978 HASSELBLAD + Zeiss CF 120mm f4 Makro-Planar @ f8 and processed film in my Home-Made 510-Pyro
Some of 'JOHN THE GARDENER'
2023-04-02-0002.jpg2023-04-02-0008.jpg

Then NATALIA and Friend
2023-04-02-0003.jpg2023-04-02-0004.jpg2023-04-02-0010.jpg2023-04-02-0011.jpg
 
soupdragon said:
You will be where in three weeks?
Click to expand...
A closely guarded secret location. :cool:

Actually it refers to the post on the previous page, Glencoe, but I hadn't noticed that I'd slipped.
 
Really really struggling with Konica 750. Keep making notes after each roll and keep discovering more errors. Almost there now, but it's a very weather dependent film. Not enough IR light in this one, but the under-exposure gives it a moody look I really quite like. Canon EOS30 with the 40mm f/2.8STM.

2023-04-04-konica750-eos30-08.jpg
 
Andysnap said:
A closely guarded secret location. :cool:

Actually it refers to the post on the previous page, Glencoe, but I hadn't noticed that I'd slipped.
Click to expand...

My wife and I are staying at loch Fyne in may.
I'll be visiting Glencoe with a pocket full of E100.
 
Harlequin565 said:
Really really struggling with Konica 750. Keep making notes after each roll and keep discovering more errors. Almost there now, but it's a very weather dependent film. Not enough IR light in this one, but the under-exposure gives it a moody look I really quite like. Canon EOS30 with the 40mm f/2.8STM.

View attachment 385648
Click to expand...
That's a lovely picture Ian. It has an ethereal look to it and the contrast between the lighter shades of the scrub, small trees, sky and the dark silhouette of the foreground tree works really well.
 
Harlequin565 said:
Really really struggling with Konica 750. Keep making notes after each roll and keep discovering more errors. Almost there now, but it's a very weather dependent film. Not enough IR light in this one, but the under-exposure gives it a moody look I really quite like. Canon EOS30 with the 40mm f/2.8STM.

View attachment 385648
Click to expand...
Ian that one is completely fabulous as far as I'm concerned!
 
Peter B said:
The Laurie White book has some info on Konica compared to Kodak
Click to expand...
Thanks Peter. What a useful tip. Lets give it a whirl at £9, although the 1* review was amusing...


Screenshot 2023-04-05 145230.png

Oh, and staying on topic, here's another one from the roll...

2023-04-04-konica750-eos30-03.jpg
 
Last edited:
More from the Olympus XA, this time Tri-X pushed to 800.

okPqKjV.jpg


VCT20iX.jpg


hySOvtQ.jpg


hlSNmnV.jpg
 
Hi Nige.
Have you ever used positive colour film in your Chroma?
 
The first shot from my new camera, scanner and fluid mount.

Technical crap:
Hasselblad 503cx plus 80mm CF lens.
Kodak Portra 160.
Developed in my kitchen sink with Cinestill C41 powder kit.
Scanned using an Epson V850 pro, fluid mount, Kami scanning fluid and Mylar sheets.
Location being Southsea Seafront.
The point of focus was the word DONUTS.

Please tell me what you feel about the colour balance and saturation as I'm newish to to colour negative film.


Fluid Mount.JPG
 
Last edited:
soupdragon said:
The first shot from my new camera, scanner and fluid mount.

Technical crap:
Hasselblad 503cx plus 80mm CF lens.
Kodak Portra 160.
Developed in my kitchen sink with Cinestill C41 powder kit.
Scanned using an Epson V850 pro, fluid mount, Kami scanning fluid and Mylar sheets.
Location being Southsea Seafront.
The point of focus was the word DONUTS.

Please tell me what you feel about the colour balance and saturation as I'm newish to to colour negative film.


View attachment 386381
Click to expand...

The colours look pretty nice to me. The correct look for colour negative films is largely subjective and will differ from lab to lab, person to person, so if you're happy then all is well.

How much faff is the liquid mounting vs the regular film holders?
 
soupdragon said:
Please tell me what you feel about the colour balance and saturation as I'm newish to to colour negative film.
Click to expand...
I don't know whether or not you use Photoshop, but I find using the Image -> Auto Colo(u)r or Auto Contrast options to give an instant alternative interpretation useful. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but it's a really quick and easy way to see if it makes a difference.
 
soupdragon said:
The first shot from my new camera, scanner and fluid mount.

Technical crap:
Hasselblad 503cx plus 80mm CF lens.
Kodak Portra 160.
Developed in my kitchen sink with Cinestill C41 powder kit.
Scanned using an Epson V850 pro, fluid mount, Kami scanning fluid and Mylar sheets.
Location being Southsea Seafront.
The point of focus was the word DONUTS.

Please tell me what you feel about the colour balance and saturation as I'm newish to to colour negative film.


View attachment 386381
Click to expand...
Colours look fine to me. (y)
 
soupdragon said:
The first shot from my new camera, scanner and fluid mount.

Technical crap:
Hasselblad 503cx plus 80mm CF lens.
Kodak Portra 160.
Developed in my kitchen sink with Cinestill C41 powder kit.
Scanned using an Epson V850 pro, fluid mount, Kami scanning fluid and Mylar sheets.
Location being Southsea Seafront.
The point of focus was the word DONUTS.

Please tell me what you feel about the colour balance and saturation as I'm newish to to colour negative film.


View attachment 386381
Click to expand...
Agree with those above, the colours look good, if a little saturated, think Eggleston on Portra. Better than most of my home processed C41 looks.
 
FishyFish said:
The colours look pretty nice to me. The correct look for colour negative films is largely subjective and will differ from lab to lab, person to person, so if you're happy then all is well.

How much faff is the liquid mounting vs the regular film holders?
Click to expand...
I find fluid mounting much easier than using the holders.
The film is very flat, the grain appears to be reduced and the initial alignment is better.
Plus I can include the frame borders (but that's a ME thing)
 
Peter B said:
I don't know whether or not you use Photoshop, but I find using the Image -> Auto Colo(u)r or Auto Contrast options to give an instant alternative interpretation useful. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but it's a really quick and easy way to see if it makes a difference.
Click to expand...
I'll be honest, I use Canon DPP for correcting my images.
It's very simple to use and free if you have a canon serial number.
 
zx9 said:
Agree with those above, the colours look good, if a little saturated, think Eggleston on Portra. Better than most of my home processed C41 looks.
Click to expand...
As I said, colour neg is all a bit new to me.
My film of choice is Fuji Velvia 50.
I guess I was trying to replicate the saturation levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top