1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. Lemaildetom

    Lemaildetom

    Messages:
    1,648
    Name:
    thomas
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    Spotless ;-)

    Sharpening does bring the worse out sometime!
     
    michael23 likes this.
  2. kingo15

    kingo15

    Messages:
    985
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Almost spotless as long as you don't zoom in

    Too much sharpening brings the worse out .


    Seriously thou looks loads better
     
    michael23 likes this.
  3. 16648511

    16648511

    Messages:
    29
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    For those that use one, what sort of tripod works well for this? I'd prefer something on the smaller/lighter end, for more occasional use than frequent.
     
  4. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I use mines mainly on a monopod with a gimbal head. Works a treat.
    I also have a Manfrotto 190 which I use ok as long as I'm holding the camera/lens. If I want total stability I use my chunkier benro tripod .
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2017
  5. Simon Kitt

    Simon Kitt

    Messages:
    717
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Reading this thread has made up my mind. Time to start saving for a 150-600
     
    kingo15 and Bobsyeruncle like this.
  6. michael23

    michael23

    Messages:
    12,540
    Name:
    michael
    Edit My Images:
    No
    T_J_G and nbaker like this.
  7. 16648511

    16648511

    Messages:
    29
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    michael23 likes this.
  8. michael23

    michael23

    Messages:
    12,540
    Name:
    michael
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Yep, handheld
     
  9. Lemaildetom

    Lemaildetom

    Messages:
    1,648
    Name:
    thomas
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Definitely happy with this lens, I took it out again on monday for the first time this year.

    It's great for wildlife
    [​IMG]

    It's great for not so wildlife
    [​IMG]


    And it's great for family portraiture!
    [​IMG]

    Maybe i should try becaming a weeding photographer with it!
     
    KathG, Swanseajack and kingo15 like this.
  10. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    KathG, SsSsSsSsSnake, Phil-D and 11 others like this.
  11. Phil White

    Phil White

    Messages:
    227
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I do the same and it works for me as well.
     
    Monkeyhanger likes this.
  12. Lemaildetom

    Lemaildetom

    Messages:
    1,648
    Name:
    thomas
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Wow stunning! How close are you from the subject to get that kind of shot? I guess there's no much cropping done to the picture?
     
  13. michael23

    michael23

    Messages:
    12,540
    Name:
    michael
    Edit My Images:
    No
  14. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Thanks.
    I was about 20ft away. A bit of a crop just to remove some unwanted background etc.
     
  15. razer

    razer

    Messages:
    786
    Name:
    Ray
    Edit My Images:
    No
    One from last summers trip to the Fane Islands. card.jpg
     
  16. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Like that. Looks like a painting.
     
    razer likes this.
  17. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Madmoggy, Swanseajack, razer and 11 others like this.
  18. Lemaildetom

    Lemaildetom

    Messages:
    1,648
    Name:
    thomas
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  19. Ben6

    Ben6

    Messages:
    933
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Been following this thread almost since it was started. Finally decided to go for one of these lenses this year but they're that good no one seems to sell them used on here. If anyone's thinking of selling theirs I've got a for sale post in the classifieds to trade for my 100L Macro or cash.
     
  20. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    1,065
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    My one came off just as winter kicked in, so it is now in it`s case till the sun comes back out and stays out.
     
  21. Ben6

    Ben6

    Messages:
    933
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    That's my thought get set up ready for spring and the start of the airshows.
     
    Dave70D likes this.
  22. Dave70D

    Dave70D

    Messages:
    1,065
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Agree as looking forward to Eastbourne this year, plus I don`t think Shoreham will have another one again.
     
    Ben6 likes this.
  23. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'm using mines most weeks at some point. It's rarely off my camera. :)
     
  24. Fuzzdog

    Fuzzdog

    Messages:
    109
    Name:
    Steve
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I keep reading this thread and I really shouldn't, as the urge to buy one of these is rising rather rapidly. Can't someone just tell me it's terrible so my wallet can feel safer? :D
     
  25. jbw

    jbw

    Messages:
    1,720
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I use my Sigma 150-600 on a Sony A7R2 body withe the Sigma Canon to E fit adapter - the images off it are so sharp you could shave with them
    James
     
  26. Phil-D

    Phil-D

    Messages:
    4,646
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I did exactly the same with in the first few weeks of getting mine, I was fortunate to retrace where I'd walked and find it :)

    What I did was put a couple of prices of sticky backed velcro on the hood, one either side, it grips the cover really well and stops it moving around

    lens hood.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2017
    scottishguy and michael23 like this.
  27. footman

    footman

    Messages:
    2,971
    Name:
    Laurence
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    What a good idea, would the adhesive mark the hood?
    I lost mine last week, didn't notice it until I saw the dog running along with the cover in his mouth!
     
  28. AdamSi

    AdamSi

    Messages:
    2,786
    Name:
    Adam
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Are you using their premium ones? I have a premium one for my 300 2.8 and its rubber backed so holds really well to lens the original style the neoprene seems to slide easily so wondered if this is the ones you have?
     
  29. Phil-D

    Phil-D

    Messages:
    4,646
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Not sure Laurence, its not something I've thought about. Suppose if I was to sell the lens the cover would go with it, once the velcros on I can't see a reason for taking it off :)

    Must be a cheapie Adam, mine definitely isn't rubber back :D
     
    AdamSi and footman like this.
  30. footman

    footman

    Messages:
    2,971
    Name:
    Laurence
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Mine is on neoprene but it still slides off.
    You make a good point Phil about the the lens and cover being considered as one unit, the velcro would not need to come off.
     
    Phil-D likes this.
  31. AdamSi

    AdamSi

    Messages:
    2,786
    Name:
    Adam
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    When I went to purchase one it was only £5 more so thought it was worth the gamble as remembered the one I had on my 500 when I had it used to move about, it was worth the extra :)
     
    Phil-D likes this.
  32. Ben6

    Ben6

    Messages:
    933
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Trying to decide between this and the sport version. I'm sure everyone in this thread had to make the same decision. Other that price what was the reason for going for the contemporary? It seems like the sport is only better for weather sealing and the contemporary is then lighter,cheaper and not noticeably worse in iq either.
     
  33. Bobsyeruncle

    Bobsyeruncle

    Messages:
    5,497
    Name:
    Robert
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I believe the sport has slightly improved IQ, but I tried the contemporary and was pleased with the IQ, and didn't need weather sealing, or extra weight. :)
     
    Ben6 likes this.
  34. kingo15

    kingo15

    Messages:
    985
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I studied the iq of both and for the price difference I didn't think it warranted the extra cost
     
    Ben6 and Bobsyeruncle like this.
  35. PINNACLE

    PINNACLE

    Messages:
    1,127
    Name:
    Martin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Snob factor as well as the S looks nicer but once covered in neoprene it makes no difference.

    The C is an excellent lens and I use mine a lot as it is my walkabout lens when out with my dogs during daylight walks. The weather sealing was my main concern but then I weighed up how often I go out in the rain to take photos for fun which is not a lot versus how often I would want to carry a close to 3kg lens around. I did buy a weather jacket for mine which has never been used yet. I also have a Sigma 120-300S which I use for football matches so I know what it is like too lug around a heavy lens (not much fun). It is also weather sealed as is my 1DMKiv but I still use a rain coat on them at rainy matches.

    I got mine second hand but the £500 saving on new prices should help you decide.
     
    Ben6, footman and kingo15 like this.
  36. Ben6

    Ben6

    Messages:
    933
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'll keep my 70-300L for a weather sealed tele. I've seen comparison images for iq and I really struggle to see very much difference at all. If anything some reviews seem to favour the contemporary saying it has less glass to move and focuses slightly faster.
     
  37. wave01

    wave01

    Messages:
    1,051
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I tried the c and didn't bother with the s as the c was heavy enough. I also tried the canon 100-400 mk2 both lenses were good but I went for the extra reach
     
  38. Ben6

    Ben6

    Messages:
    933
    Name:
    Ben
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    How did you feel iq compared to the 100-400 out of interest?
     
  39. wave01

    wave01

    Messages:
    1,051
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The canon lens was very good it was also lighter than the sigma.
    I was only looking at the back screen and to be honest the sigma held its own. If you look in the birds photos I have posted some flamingoes and I feel that shows how good this lens is
     
  40. PINNACLE

    PINNACLE

    Messages:
    1,127
    Name:
    Martin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Most of my recent photos have been low light as in at dusk or past sunset. ISO12,800, f6.3 handheld 1/1000 and 1/640 at 600mm using a 7Dii so I guess this lens will work in tough conditions and will focus in poor light. Noise reduction in lightroom up to 70 and I usually only go to 30 so a lot of noise but not to bad a result if you want owl photos.

    [​IMG]
    Hunting Barn Owl
    by Martin Billard, on Flickr

    [​IMG]
    Barn Owl spotting prey
    by Martin Billard, on Flickr

    [​IMG]
    Barn Owl Hunting
    by Martin Billard, on Flickr

    [​IMG]
    Barn Owl Hunting
    by Martin Billard, on Flickr
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2017
    KathG, nbaker, Ploddles and 12 others like this.

Share This Page