- Messages
- 1,418
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have just emailed them asking why they have such a rule. It keep the pressure on. Email is info@puxton.co.uk
It looks as though they have put an email filtering system in place as the email has been bounced back.It could be that they have been getting a lot of inquiries about this subject so have set up a filter to reject any emails containing the words "single men or women" . They are blocking any emails with the words "single men and women" I have just emailed asking if everyone at the park is OK and it went through no problem. They clearly have not got the courage of their own convictions and will probably cave in if the pressure gets too much.LOLI have just emailed them asking why they have such a rule. It keep the pressure on. Email is info@puxton.co.uk
Take a screenshot of the original text, send that in the body of the email (together with a line or two of genuine text e.g. are you open tomorrow) and it'll get past the keyword filterIt looks as though they have put an email filtering system in place as the email has been bounced back.It could be that they have been getting a lot of inquiries about this subject so have set up a filter to reject any emails containing the words "single men or women" . They are blocking any emails with the words "single men and women" I have just emailed asking if everyone at the park is OK and it went through no problem. They clearly have not got the courage of their own convictions and will probably cave in if the pressure gets too much.LOL
It looks as though they have put an email filtering system in place as the email has been bounced back.It could be that they have been getting a lot of inquiries about this subject so have set up a filter to reject any emails containing the words "single men or women" . They are blocking any emails with the words "single men and women" I have just emailed asking if everyone at the park is OK and it went through no problem. They clearly have not got the courage of their own convictions and will probably cave in if the pressure gets too much.LOL
Reading the Trip Advisor reviews, there seems to be enough already wrong with the park that a minded group of individuals could disrupt their activities with suitable reports to the relevant authorities...
I have no qualms in seeing bigots come acropper. They've cynically played to the (mob) gallery to boost their 'family friendly' credentials so they're not above playing dirty.
And since the issues relate to alleged breaches of Health & Safety, Food Standards, Animal Welfare and even an alleged assault on a child, they're probably due a thorough inspection or two.
Oh, and here's some dirt on the boss - it's all out in the public domain http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/business_director_in_court_1_3058711
Edit: Here's the sentence http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/rugby_club_parking_manoeuvre_leads_to_driving_ban_1_3288580
What a lovely man. I particularly enjoyed how he tried to refuse any responsibility for his wrongdoing. Wouldn't it be regrettable if this ended up on their Facebook page or Trip Advisor?
I'm quite tempted to email them to ask what their policy is about drink driving around the carpark. Snigger.
It's the same registered address as "Puxton Limited" - I guess it's the park's address?
Well, it's up on trip advisor - http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUs...r_Mare_Somerset_England.html#CHECK_RATES_CONT
Scroll down to Was this review helpful? and vote yes - now that's going to get their attention.
Oh, and find and contact http://www.puxton.co.uk/Find-and-Contact has a fax number
That's strange - because as well as having that as the registered address, it's also Puxton Ltd's official trading address.Not quite - it's the other side of the M5.
The definition of a heterosexual is, or the bottom line of such, is someone who is sexually attracted to women.
Edit required.
And followed by this.....
"I visited here back in the summer and had a lovely day with my god-daughter. Reading the leaflet before our visit with her mum we both said how good it was that Puxton Park were making the effort to make it a safe place for both parents and kids"
What does that mean? What effort to make it safe? Are they saying that "Wow.. finally!... a safe place for kids, because you know what, I was getting a little bit fed up with having to defend my little darlings from packs of pedophiles (sic). Thank God someone's seen the light and made it impossible for those filthy single men and women to come in here and try to have sex with my children" Because basically... that IS what this "mum" is saying. Yes, I use "Mum" here as a derogatory term, because there's a certain type of "Mum" who just utterly lose the plot once they have kids. It's as if, for some people, having kids results in your intellect being expunged along with the placenta.
This is where we are at with the vast majority of "Mums" I'm afraid:
The vast majority of child abuse, whether sexual or not, happens either in the home, or near the home, by someone at least in some way, known to the family concerned. Those are facts. However, despite facts, the majority of people seem to believe that paedophiles are solitary, skulking, lonely figures who actually visit parks and schools to "attack" children (not helped by Jimmy Savile... but what they fail to realise that Jimmy Savile was anything but skulking and solitary... he was hidden in plain sight). By letting in adults who are accompanied by children only as a policy, the reality is that they are most likely doing precisely nothing to make the children safer in Puxton park whatsoever. However.... it will convince the brain dead "Mums" that it's a green light to child safety, and therefore a brilliant idea. You can't really blame the Director of the park... not really. He's cashing in on people's stupidity. It doesn't get him off the hook, but he's just being a good little capitalist, and we love that too here our green and pleasant land.
As usual with people (who I always assume are gibbering idiots until proven otherwise... it saves time), they have a distorted view of reality. Most people will agree with policies like this because it's supposed to protect their kids, so HOW COULD IT POSSIBLY BE BAD.... that's what they'll say. Then the same people, BECAUSE the world is such a dangerous place (absolutely littered with predatory paedophiles), they drive their kids everywhere.... drive.. one of the most dangerous forms of transport you could subject your kids to. Most I see every morning, do this while checking their make-up in the mirror, carrying cups of coffee or using the phone. Their kids are MUCH more likely to die in a road traffic incident than at the hands of a paedophile, yet there they are, every morning... the "mums" in their 4x4s.. that metal envelope of invulnerability (it has a NCAP 5 star rating you know..) utterly blasé to the dangers: Arguing with kids, turning round to talk/shout/berate/punish them for something, phone in hand, drinking coffee... basically... driving like people who clearly have no idea what danger their in ALL the time while on the road.
So ladies and gentlemen: Give up. You can't do anything with people when they've abandoned logic. Once a person abandons logic, they are no longer reasonable, and if history has taught us anything, it's that it's those that have abandoned logic are the ones that we need to be VERY distrustful of... but the ones you are most powerless do do anything about, because they're usually the majority.
Also Jimmy didn't work solitary at all of the news is anything to go by he was known to be up to it within bbc and had colleagues also involved.
...
There is actually a DANGER in behaving the way "Mums" do, as it diverts media, and hence pubic attention away from where the real dangers lie sometimes, and THAT'S why so many get away with it.
Edit required.
Sniggerpubic attention
Phnaar phnaar.I'm leaving that in
It is a well known "fact" that all male photographers are perverts and terrorists. Old ones with white hair and beards should be locked up or put out of their misery automatically.
...and what about the women?