- Messages
- 1,685
- Name
- Julian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
was it the £240 price for conversion?
They pointed me to the standard details on their website for prices, so I'd say yes but I didn't specifically ask about the price being the same.
was it the £240 price for conversion?
Thanks for the update, I’m not convinced the whether it is a viable option. Also thinking from a resale point of view, I think th Canon mount would hold up betterI've had confirmation back from Sigma, they can convert to Sony FE mount but only for lenses that they have released in that mount. So unfortunately no 120-300 at the moment.
Thanks for the update, I’m not convinced the whether it is a viable option. Also thinking from a resale point of view, I think th Canon mount would hold up better
yes, for £240Are you saying that i can give sigma my existing 35mm art canon mount lens and they will convert it to proper emount?
Where are you getting it from?Tammy 28-75 in stock, trying to get myself working from home tomorrow so I can get it!
Are you saying that i can give sigma my existing 35mm art canon mount lens and they will convert it to proper emount?
How do you go about doing it? Do you have a link to more details on what to do?yes, for £240
for some of the larger lenses, eg 85mm, its just under £400 though - so might not be worth it on those
yea could doNot worth it, sell yours for £400 and buy brand new native FE 35 ART for £650!
Where are you getting it from?
Another experience of focus issues.
How do you go about doing it? Do you have a link to more details on what to do?
So far, many of those that reported focus issues with the Tamron have all resolved it by setting the camera to focus priority.
actually the opposite. Sony lenses hold their value better than canon lenses as there are few of them.
So far, many of those that reported focus issues with the Tamron have all resolved it by setting the camera to focus priority.
Also been very impressed, no mirrorless Ive used until now has beaten my D750 as an allrounder, cant think of any way the D750 is better for my requirements (IQ or AF wise), its (more than) what I hoped Nikon wouldve developed in the D750 mk2 but they have left their development waaaaaay to late. The D750 is 4 years old now.
Siggy 50 testing in decent light, f1.4 / 1/4000 ISO 100.
Eye AF, 10FPS, subject walking toward me, 24 out of 31 in focus (last 2 were because hit MFD)! MC11 combo cant do that, definitely better than adapted.
Try it at 8 FPS, in the little I've tested eye af I had better results with that over 10 fps.
Siggy 50 testing in decent light, f1.4 / 1/4000 ISO 100.
Eye AF, 10FPS, subject walking toward me, 24 out of 31 in focus (last 2 were because hit MFD)! MC11 combo cant do that, definitely better than adapted.
That's the front focus issue not the AF failure requiring them to remove the lens.
I'm hoping the latter is just a small batch issue as I don't like any of the other options in this range at the moment.
how is the focussing compared to your samyang 35mm f/1.4? and also how is focussing noise compared to it?
AF is better, noise hmmm they're both not dead silent, I wouldn't say either are offensive.
tamron 28-75mm samples on dpreview
tamron confirms focussing issue and will provide firmware update via camera:
https://www.tamron.co.jp/news/press_release/20180530.html
This thread Is more up to date then dpreview. We're already sampling the sigma art lenses!
Bodes well for the 105mm sigma art
dpreview has more samples than this thread and this thread has no samples of 28-75mm
With the Sigma Art FE lenses?
no I am talking about the tamron 28-75mm.
I am not sure why Jonney felt the need to bring sigma ART lenses in to it!!
Amusingly the old Tamron 28-75 works on the mc-11, I forgot how cheap and nasty it was.