Argh the GAS is strong. I've currently got 12mm 2.8 Zeiss, 23mm 1.4 18-55mm, 50mm Zeiss Macro, 56mm 1.2 and 55-200 for my X-T2.
Secondary GAS was for a 16mm 1.4 and 90mm 2.0; Thus far I've been able to resist due to prices - I think the 16mm is a bit overpriced, and the 90mm is desirable - that was going to be my next purchase.
Tertiary GAS was for 16-55 and 50-140 - I'd love these I think, but am put off by the bulk, cost and lack of OIS on the 16-55.
However, (dammit), this weekend, I have an option on a 50-140 and 1.4x teleconverter, and Currys have this 10% off thing, which combined with the 125 Fuji cashback makes the 16-55 look a steal. So I could skip Secondary GAS, and jump to Tertiary GAS mode, and get those two, with a net "saving" in that if I had those two, I'd not need Secondary GAS and could sell my 18-55 and 55-200. But I'd be gaining bloat with the tertiary GAS level, albeit convenience.
I never had these issues with Canon - it was full on bloat and expense if you wanted fast quality L Zooms, or cheaper less desirable non L products (shudder
) or even more overpriced L primes. The Fuji system makes it harder in that most of their lenses are brill, even the moderate level zooms.
Decisions decisions....