Lovely pano that, Ian. You're making me feel bad not having been out for a while with mine!
Just a simple Fujigraph taken at Folkestone Kent UK of the Outer Harbour with the Old Fish Market in the background.
X-T2, 18-55mm Lens, 1/250th @ F8, ISO-200, Handheld.
Outer Harbour (Folkestone) (1) (C)-03195C by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr
for looking.,
George.
A quick one from last night. Lovely sunset, just lacking some clouds. Five shot pano, XT2 and 16-50mm
Very nice photograph. I really like the processing.
Lovely reflections and contrast between the red hull and the blues of the sea and sky. Reminds me that that better weather is on the way!
"Maybe just getting a tad tight with the top of the south tower to the top of the frame, but nothing to distract from a very nice image"
George.
Am thinking the same, however it involves selling my 35mm 1.4 to go towards it. Torn, I am.Can anyone comment on the 16-55? I'm torn between the 23 1.4 and the 16-55. I only have the budget for one or the other. Im thinking more lens for my buck in the 16-55? or is that flawed thinking? I had the 23 before and loved it (Till I sold it when I thought I was switching systems) Now I'm firmly Fuji I need more glass. I have the 56 f1.2 already and want to add to that. Main shooting is portraits and animals plus some interior architectural stuff.
Can anyone comment on the 16-55? I'm torn between the 23 1.4 and the 16-55. I only have the budget for one or the other. Im thinking more lens for my buck in the 16-55? or is that flawed thinking? I had the 23 before and loved it (Till I sold it when I thought I was switching systems) Now I'm firmly Fuji I need more glass. I have the 56 f1.2 already and want to add to that. Main shooting is portraits and animals plus some interior architectural stuff.
Can anyone comment on the 16-55? I'm torn between the 23 1.4 and the 16-55. I only have the budget for one or the other. Im thinking more lens for my buck in the 16-55? or is that flawed thinking? I had the 23 before and loved it (Till I sold it when I thought I was switching systems) Now I'm firmly Fuji I need more glass. I have the 56 f1.2 already and want to add to that. Main shooting is portraits and animals plus some interior architectural stuff.
Can anyone comment on the 16-55? I'm torn between the 23 1.4 and the 16-55. I only have the budget for one or the other. Im thinking more lens for my buck in the 16-55? or is that flawed thinking? I had the 23 before and loved it (Till I sold it when I thought I was switching systems) Now I'm firmly Fuji I need more glass. I have the 56 f1.2 already and want to add to that. Main shooting is portraits and animals plus some interior architectural stuff.
So the general consensus is the 16-55 isn't suited for portraits?
So the general consensus is the 16-55 isn't suited for portraits? Indoors? As I said I have the 56 which I love but sometimes the space is restrictive. I have a horrible feeling I'll be chucking some money around soon!
I find it ok for portraits to be honest, its not as good as the 56mm but that goes for most lenses, I think it depends what portraits you are doing if you dont need the af speed the 35mm f1.4 is for me very nice if the 56mm is to long. But if you want shooting children and you need something shorter than 56mm personally dont think you could do a lot better then the 16-55 plus you got the versatility of the zoom.
Can anyone comment on the 16-55? I'm torn between the 23 1.4 and the 16-55. I only have the budget for one or the other. Im thinking more lens for my buck in the 16-55? or is that flawed thinking? I had the 23 before and loved it (Till I sold it when I thought I was switching systems) Now I'm firmly Fuji I need more glass. I have the 56 f1.2 already and want to add to that. Main shooting is portraits and animals plus some interior architectural stuff.
You guys are saving me a wad of cash. Keep going [emoji16]I fully expected to pick up a 16-55 when I got into the Fuji system a few years back, but it still hasn't happened. I do have the 18-55 but it is rarely used. The 23mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2 I really enjoy using as a combo, and that's what I take out the majority of the time. When I want to take a single lens it's usually a toss up between the 23mm f1.4 and 35mm f1.4.
Yeah I have three kids under 7 and along with they’re assorted mates I’m doing a LOT of kids stuff. Parents are always asking me to supply images for them. Hence my original question. I’m thinking spring/summer a 55-140 will be added for long candid stuff. Ideally I cover all possibilities from right studios to woodland/meadow stuff
Yeah I have three kids under 7 and along with they’re assorted mates I’m doing a LOT of kids stuff. Parents are always asking me to supply images for them. Hence my original question. I’m thinking spring/summer a 55-140 will be added for long candid stuff. Ideally I cover all possibilities from right studios to woodland/meadow stuff
Been going a bit stir crazy with the lack of time to go out the last few months, this is one from one of the few times I managed to get out.
Lonely Bush by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Been going a bit stir crazy with the lack of time to go out the last few months, this is one from one of the few times I managed to get out.
Lonely Bush by Graham Norton, on Flickr
That's a super composition. The diagonal makes it. The separation of tones in each segment makes each stand out and they balance out dark/light well.Been going a bit stir crazy with the lack of time to go out the last few months, this is one from one of the few times I managed to get out.
Lonely Bush by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Are those numbers just the aspect ratio or are they stitched panos of 20x9 etc?Saw the Tyne was looking nice and calm as I drove over it on the way home from work so nipped back with the camera for blue hour. These are with the 16-55 by the way @NickTB
Tyne Reflections 20:9 by G.A.D, on Flickr
Tyne Reflections 32:9 by G.A.D, on Flickr
Are those numbers just the aspect ratio or are they stitched panos of 20x9 etc?
"Maybe just getting a tad tight with the top of the south tower to the top of the frame, but nothing to distract from a very nice image"
George.
I managed to add a slice of sky to give headroom above Tower Bridge - big improvement, and my son has ordered a print for his bedroom (payment = him cleaning his bedroom). So extra thanks from both of us for the comment.
Is there a dedicated Fuji GFX thread here me wonders ?
Totally loving images I've seen but the cost is quite expensive.
Look lovely don't they?! An absolute extravagance for me though and I've convinced myself that it's too long for 99% of my portraits anywaySome guy in a Facebook photo group I'm a member of keeps posting images taken with the XF56 - they are rendered beautifully and now I want one
There isn’t Pete. But I’m sure @G.K.Jnr. has one.
That’s one ver nce Fujigraph Sir, with a well balanced composition, nice sky and interest in the foreground, and a good full range of mono tones.
George.
Really like this. Lovely B&W, foreground subject and sky
That's a super composition. The diagonal makes it. The separation of tones in each segment makes each stand out and they balance out dark/light well.
Nicely processed too. Looks like really nice light, despite being overcast you still got some directional light from a low sun, love it when that happens.