Disagree all you like, but show me a negative review on it that doesn't complain about the video side, show me negative reviews that solely concentrate on it as a photography camera. Best of luck on that. The Panasonic FF bodies are not aimed at the same market, they are much ore expensive and they are indeed much more 'feature' packed - and every video I've seen on them has been very much video-centric also. I've already seen these reviewers moan about it not having a flip screen. Again, we don't see the same complaints when it comes to Fuji - no Ibis, no flip out screen ... ah, that's ok, Fuji are just great anyway
they get a pass where Canon get hounded it seems.
As for ergonomics?? give me the body style of the RP over any Sony any day! Looks plenty comfortable enough to me, especially if you add the optional grip.
Also can we maybe go one page in a Canon thread without mentioning Sony?
I mean, you can also pick up a lovely Olympus em10mkII and lens for less and it'll have amazing IBIS, and very good IQ. But this isn't an Olympus thread.
Anyone only into taking pictures looking at the RP can't but say it looks sweet value, and I have already seen plenty of positive reviews that I'm certain were not biased in anyway. They are out there, and I was certainly not only looking for positives. I am interested in the camera, so will watch any review on it regardless. This is how I know precisely what the moans and groans about it are.