karmagarda
Good between the sheets
- Messages
- 2,821
- Name
- Conor
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Just a quick crop on the flower shot to see how much detail I can get out of these negatives. I'm very impressed. Had to reduce the size of this one to a third to make it somewhat acceptable size wize
Anyway, a crop of "shoot":
That works far better
Is that actually a physical crop (as in taking scissors to the negative) or is it done digitally on the scanned version?
(sorry - I'm completely clueless when it comes to film )
See you again in about a month, when you have your next batch
Hi Conor
It's great to see you're still persevering (or battling!) with film - good on ya!
There've already been loads of comments and you did a pretty good self-crit (although harsh, imo) so rather than repeat everything ... my favourites are 'Single' and 'Stair'. I alos like the crop of the flower shot.
Jean
Well done for persevering with film! Some of the colours are a bit weird - I never developed colour, only B&W, but I always found that being careful and accurate with temperatures at all times really paid off. Even so you have some good images here which fit the themes quite well, particularly the last one.
I feel your exasperation here - I never choose the quiet coach as I get so irritated with all the noise there, whereas in an ordinary coach I am much more resigned....
Blimey, taking shots on film - as if a 52 isn't difficult enough on its' own.
Really admire your efforts and the fact you are sticking with it. There are a couple of real crackers on here - the "single" one has a lovely feel and tone and clarity to it - and the composition is really good with the buildings at the top above the trees.
The Play (skis) is also brilliant - again i really like the composition and the way the people line up, even down to the skiier appearing between the 2 vertical lines.
I guess shooting film is a high risk strategy - more to go wrong and less that can be done to retrieve a shot.
well done Conor... overcame the film disaster and back on track dedication.
Stare, it looks like a little motion blur there, but you know what... as a kind of arty secret shot it works..
Stop... sounds good to me... nice take on it too.
Isolation, that sounds good to me too ... it's a bit wonky and could do with a straighten ...
Post, it's an odd interpretation, but it works for me... Mono really works well on this one too.
Metal... I don't see much a crowbar there, very good take on it.. I really like it, the effect is odd but it works so well.
Grunge... I get it. I don't get your comment... but I get the shot. it is a hidden grunge, and the "bin" looks very clean and shiny. Excellent use of DOF
Beginnings... very well done. That's a great portrait of your Dad there Conor, possibly could have done with a little more light on his left, but it works for me as it is. I think you've captured just what you wanted to as well.
Well done on catching up, Conor. Sorry about the disaster with the film development, though - you obviously need to lock yourself in when loading!
You have some good pics here - my favourites are Quality, Metal and Beginnings.
I love the shapes and colours in Quality - the slight orange in the lower right corner look like fogging, but whatever it is it complements the lovely blues of the rest.
Metal is great - composition and colours forming a near-abstract. Well spotted.
Finally what a lovely portrait of your father. If you could just lighten the deep shadow on the right (his left) it would be even better, but that may be just my monitor.
Great catch up Conor.
Indulgence really stands out for me. For some reason it reminds me of a 70's anti-drink driving campaign . . . don't ask me why
I really like it though. Good composition and contrast in it.
It may be a joker, but I love the metal shot too.
You're spot on with your caption of metal rain. Lovely feel to this one and very effective.
Finally, beginnings also jumps out.
It's a lovely portrait to start with, but after reading the narrative with it, it has even more poignancy. Like this a lot. In fact, I even like the uneven lighting and shadows on his face. IMO it adds to the natural, candid feel of the shot.
p.s. I got your body parts reference in grunge even if John didn't
Well done on catching up, Conor, and what a disaster with the roll of film.
I really like most of these catch up shots but favourites for me are metal (love the lines and the angle) and beginnings (love the lighting).
Hope you can stay back on track with the 52 now.
Jenny
Metal: It might not be on film but it's a great shot nonetheless
Grunge: , what a fantastic spot KG
Beginnings: What a fantastic picture and a great tribute to your dad and I love the lighting on this. My favourite for this theme
Fair enough, though in fact I don't think you need to be so purist about it. In a traditional wet darkroom you it would have been the easiest thing to dodge the shadowed area a little, and I would have done it as a matter of course. The film shows plenty of shadow detail in the face - you just need to adjust the printing to compensate for paper not having as great a dynamic range as film.I agree on the portrait shot about the dark bit on the right of the shot, needs just a tad more light to lift some shadows. But I've always been adamant not to touch my film shots in something like photoshop apart from getting rid of hairs and dust I think ruin the photo.
Fair enough, though in fact I don't think you need to be so purist about it. In a traditional wet darkroom you it would have been the easiest thing to dodge the shadowed area a little, and I would have done it as a matter of course. The film shows plenty of shadow detail in the face - you just need to adjust the printing to compensate for paper not having as great a dynamic range as film.
IMO bringing out all the detail that you have caught on the film doesn't count as manipulation in the way that, e.g. replacing skies is (which I used to do too )