Stephen L
I asked a Stupid Question Once...
- Messages
- 6,639
- Name
- Stephen
- Edit My Images
- No
Like wot he said!They fail to amaze you? Nice shot!
Like wot he said!They fail to amaze you? Nice shot!
Got that totally wrong lol, totally amaze me would be more suitingThey fail to amaze you? Nice shot!
From that perspective you'd only need one fuji thread. XP1 is more like XP2 than XT2 will be. As I understand it, despite the obvious viewfinder differences the xt2 will have tethering and better video features.
I agree, the X Pro thread is a little niche and lonely
I vote to merge this with the XT1 thread [emoji3]
+1 considering a lot of us have more than one X camera it makes sense.I think now that the X-T2 has been added to the X-T1 thread that would make sense.
it's a Fuji master plan to make xp2 owners feel inferior and chop it in for an xt2I should have waited for the XT2 rather than buying a camera described as being suitable for "snapshots"
http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n160707_01.html
Sorry, no. Mine all seem to exposed at what I expect.Any XP2 users notice their camera underexposing shots compared to other X cameras ? I noticed a lot of shots I took last week in Barca were 1 or 1.5 stops underexposed, didn't seem to matter what metering mode I used. I've also noticed a lot of shots on reviews of the XT2 seem underexposed (to me) maybe its the higher dynamic range of the new sensor makes the shots more contrasty.
If you look at these shots, albeit from an XT-2 you'll see what I mean.Sorry, no. Mine all seem to exposed at what I expect.
I see what you mean, they're very contrasty, but I think that's his style.If you look at these shots, albeit from an XT-2 you'll see what I mean.
http://f16.click/gear/fuji-x-t2-review.html
I've not noticed either, apart from user error of courseAny XP2 users notice their camera underexposing shots compared to other X cameras ? I noticed a lot of shots I took last week in Barca were 1 or 1.5 stops underexposed, didn't seem to matter what metering mode I used. I've also noticed a lot of shots on reviews of the XT2 seem underexposed (to me) maybe its the higher dynamic range of the new sensor makes the shots more contrasty.
Barring lack of dynamic range, no camera gives under (or over) exposed shots. That's the responsibility of the nut behind the shutter.Surely this must be scene dependent.
Every camera I've ever used gave under exposed shots in some situations.
Barring lack of dynamic range, no camera gives under (or over) exposed shots. That's the responsibility of the nut behind the shutter.
That's the beauty and purpose of the live histogram.In your world maybe.
Here on planet earth you can read how the metering works in the manual and if you can't see how the camera can be fooled you are indeed on another planet.
Something in your auto iso set differently maybe?Any XP2 users notice their camera underexposing shots compared to other X cameras ? I noticed a lot of shots I took last week in Barca were 1 or 1.5 stops underexposed, didn't seem to matter what metering mode I used. I've also noticed a lot of shots on reviews of the XT2 seem underexposed (to me) maybe its the higher dynamic range of the new sensor makes the shots more contrasty.
If you look at these shots, albeit from an XT-2 you'll see what I mean.
http://f16.click/gear/fuji-x-t2-review.html
For me the AF-C custom options are what the X Pro 2 needs, I plan to use mine for rugbyphotography and what I've seen of the implementation of this on the X-T2 is exactly what I need. I hope Fuji change their minds and go the whole hog.Just in case anyone missed it - http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n160707_04.html
X-Pro2 Firmware update confirmed for October to bring the X-T2 AF improvements apart from the new AF-C custom options.
I hope they do too. It's not going to effect xt2 sales, people prefer either body style(or both). It's a win-win for Fuji.For me the AF-C custom options are what the X Pro 2 needs, I plan to use mine for rugbyphotography and what I've seen of the implementation of this on the X-T2 is exactly what I need. I hope Fuji change their minds and go the whole hog.
Not selective, discerning.There's a few that have one on here but never show up on this thread.
We must be very selective Jim, or we've bought a pup
I don't mind, it's nice to be part of an exclusive club
I'll go with thatNot selective, discerning.
I don't think there has been a huge uptake of the X Pro 2 going by the dearth of postings in this group anyhow. Comparatively the X-T1/10 group is very busy.
On another forum the owners seem to spend their time trying to find fault with it. This side of the Atlantic we just use it, either that or we have better-built versions!It seems very popular broadly online but not here for some reason, either that or we're all too busy enjoying our camera instead of posting about it!