1. Woodsy

    Woodsy POTY Winner 2009

    Messages:
    7,046
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Go ahead :)
     
  2. Woodsy

    Woodsy POTY Winner 2009

    Messages:
    7,046
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Untitled.jpg

    That's what I just got with the dropper tool in PS. You're right, there is a magenta cast! I have to be honest though, on my monitor I can barely detect that by eye, but fully appreciate monitors are different! The red circle is roughly where the dropper was placed.
     
  3. Andysnap

    Andysnap POTY (Film) 2015

    Messages:
    15,039
    Name:
    Andy Grant
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Its very straightforward, there are only actually four colours, blue, yellow, beige and a muddy brown. If you see any other colours you should consult an optician as there is obviously a problem with your eyes. :)
     
    Woodsy, medwaygreen and RaglanSurf like this.
  4. ChrisR

    ChrisR

    Messages:
    8,095
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Oh dear, sorry Jonathan, I didn't mean to provoke such controversy. The original comment was provoked (in part) because I have rarely shot slide film without getting a magenta cast somewhere. I'm now learning that what I see may be significantly affected by an un-clibrated Mac screen.

    I was also wondering what you get if you place the dropper on the bottom left hand corner of the image in #20642 (shaded part of white foam)?
     
  5. dmb

    dmb

    Messages:
    1,151
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes

    Colour balance is a minefield. Even if we were all in the same room looking at the slide projected onto a pure white background using a daylight bulb (which of course we don't as we use tungsten or halogen) we might still have fun deciding if there was a cast or not. Apart from red/green colour vision deficiency 1 in 12 men (1 in 200 women) there is the problem of perception. Our brains unconsciously interpret the signals we get from the receptors in the eye and adjust our perception. So for example we see a piece of white paper as white even when lit by full sun, in shade, or sunset. That can even occur within the same field of view. Add to all that the setting in the conversion from slide to digital, us using different monitors, graphics cards and sitting in differently lit rooms it is a wonder we can even agree that those are waves. The acid test could be does it look like @Woodsy remembers.

    Balancing by choosing a neutral white or grey area can help if you know what is supposed to be neutral. In some of these pictures you have white wave foam lit by reddish sunset light on one side and in the shadow lit by blue sky. That is almost a recipe for purple. For the comparison below I chose a thin vertical strip, not seeing the whole picture avoids some of the messing around the brain does. Then chose the crest of the wave where it changed from lit to shadow which is a subjective choice in itself but might be closest to neutral white.

    comparison.jpg

    Strip 1 is the screen capture off Flickr

    Strip 2 I adjusted by reducing magenta (increasing green) by about 10 units in Photoshop so that the top of the wave came out neutral (that does mess with brightness a bit and would only be a first step)

    Strip 3 is what Photoshop does if you tell it to auto adjust colour,

    The numbers ARE neutral white.
     
  6. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger

    Messages:
    2,457
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    @ChrisR is right, there's a pinky magenta tinge going on in those last two, more so the second one. It could possibly be the light from the sunset, but as I wasn't there this is just a guess.
     
  7. Woodsy

    Woodsy POTY Winner 2009

    Messages:
    7,046
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It's really no drama chap! :D

    I'll have a look at the bit you mention in a sec and upload another dropper analysis.

    I've re-edited a few of these and will make replacements on flickr shortly. Tiny edits though, so don't get your hopes up :D
     
  8. Woodsy

    Woodsy POTY Winner 2009

    Messages:
    7,046
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  9. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger

    Messages:
    2,457
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Meanwhile, back in Dudley...

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

     
  10. Andysnap

    Andysnap POTY (Film) 2015

    Messages:
    15,039
    Name:
    Andy Grant
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  11. medwaygreen

    medwaygreen

    Messages:
    3,846
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I am very impressed too Andy, good composition, contrast and very fine grain. Nice work.(y)
     
    Fraser Euan White and Andysnap like this.
  12. Andysnap

    Andysnap POTY (Film) 2015

    Messages:
    15,039
    Name:
    Andy Grant
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  13. Andysnap

    Andysnap POTY (Film) 2015

    Messages:
    15,039
    Name:
    Andy Grant
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    And my current monopolising of this thread continues.....

    Ross Ensign 16-20 on Ektar.

    A couple of versions of this one, black and white first -
    [​IMG]The Old Shed Sepia by Andy, on Flickr

    and a slightly coloured version as well, thoughts?
    [​IMG]The Old Shed by Andy, on Flickr

    ! am well aware that the 'magenta' issue may raise its head again but I can't see it and if you tell me its there I can't do anything about getting rid of it so its best to keep it to yourself ;):D

    [​IMG]Sizergh Castle 1 by Andy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]Stepping Stones 2 by Andy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]Forest Bridge by Andy, on Flickr

    and finally a couple more from the Baby Rollei

    [​IMG]Sunday Drivers by Andy, on Flickr

    [​IMG]Fordson by Andy, on Flickr

    I am still amazed at how good the little Ross Ensign is, especially as it only cost me a fiver.
     
    john.margetts, Woodsy, Tilz and 9 others like this.
  14. medwaygreen

    medwaygreen

    Messages:
    3,846
    Name:
    Richard
    Edit My Images:
    No
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Very good set Andy, what film did you use in the baby Rollei as it performs very well. You have got to love Ektar and those first two conversions are very nice indeed, I am in favour of the first one.(y)
     
    ChrisR and Andysnap like this.
  15. FishyFish

    FishyFish

    Messages:
    2,248
    Name:
    Nige
    Edit My Images:
    No
  16. todders

    todders

    Messages:
    1,321
    Name:
    adrian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Meanwhile back in dudley. :) Olympus Omn1 35-70 F3.6 Kodak Pro-Image 100



    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2018
  17. sirch

    sirch Official Forum Numpty 2015

    Messages:
    6,614
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Lovely photo, nice painterly feel to it.
     
    todders likes this.
  18. Carl Hall

    Carl Hall

    Messages:
    2,825
    Name:
    Carl
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Camping is great. Camping with gin is better :D

    Hassie 500cm + 80mm. Ektar 100 D&S by filmdev.

    [​IMG]
    Gin
    by Carl Hall, on Flickr
     
    David_H, mothdust, sirch and 8 others like this.
  19. StephenM

    StephenM

    Messages:
    2,496
    Name:
    Stephen
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    "Camping" is "camp" + "gin" (anagram) isn't it? Heated by a spirit stove? :D:exit:
     
  20. Mrs Snap

    Mrs Snap

    Messages:
    566
    Name:
    Janet
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Correct! :agree::D(y)
     
  21. dmb

    dmb

    Messages:
    1,151
    Name:
    David
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Need a series of 'shots' each one with more camera shake as the bottle gets emptier.
     
    Carl Hall and Fraser Euan White like this.
  22. Mr Badger

    Mr Badger

    Messages:
    2,457
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Looking at the size of that bottle, and if I were involved, I think you'd need a high-speed camera for that! :whistle:
     
    Fraser Euan White likes this.
  23. Fraser Euan White

    Fraser Euan White

    Messages:
    628
    Name:
    Fraser White
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  24. ChrisR

    ChrisR

    Messages:
    8,095
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Bloomin' 'eck Fraser, that's lovely. And IMHO the framing works extremely well, too. (y)(y)(y)
     
    Fraser Euan White likes this.
  25. john.margetts

    john.margetts

    Messages:
    1,736
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Some of my test shots from my "new" Ars Acon rangefinder camera. Dates from 1956/8 or so I am told. An excellent piece of kit. Film was Agfa Vista+ now a couple of years out of date.

    This first one is a test of the rangefinder - focusing on the finial. Still in good adjustment after 60+ years.
    Acon-16.jpg
    Acon-6.jpg Acon-25.jpg Acon-11.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2018
  26. Fraser Euan White

    Fraser Euan White

    Messages:
    628
    Name:
    Fraser White
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Looking good John - excellent results from an 'older' camera and a relief to know the rangefinder doesn't need adjusting. Exposures also look good so shutter must be accurate as well :)
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2018
  27. john.margetts

    john.margetts

    Messages:
    1,736
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Scans cover a multitude of sins but looking at the negatives, they are about the right density. Also says plenty about my trusty Leningrad meter.
     
    Fraser Euan White likes this.
  28. Harlequin565

    Harlequin565

    Messages:
    2,780
    Name:
    Ian
    Edit My Images:
    No
    First proper photos from the Rollei that I picked up from @Andysnap

    Just a brief evening walk around the village as I get my knee back to full fitness... The last one is over sharpened (still getting used to scanning) but I'm pretty happy with them. Both will get entered into the village show under "Village Life" :)

    [​IMG]
    Around The Village: WCC
    by Ian, on Flickr

    [​IMG]
    Around The Village: St Mary's
    by Ian, on Flickr

    Rolleiflex Automat, Ektar 100
     
  29. Andysnap

    Andysnap POTY (Film) 2015

    Messages:
    15,039
    Name:
    Andy Grant
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    They have a very Rollei feel to them Ian, I like. :)(y)
     
    Harlequin565 likes this.
  30. Sir SR

    Sir SR

    Messages:
    5,789
    Name:
    Shaheed
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Slowly shooting more film again

    Bronica SQA, Ilford b&w 80mm @ f2.8

    [​IMG]Sophia Film by Sir._.SR, on Flickr
     
  31. FujiLove

    FujiLove

    Messages:
    2,688
    Edit My Images:
    No
    One of my favourite photos of our little girl who lost her fight with cancer last week. Devastated.


    [​IMG]
     
    srichards, Hallsy, David_H and 7 others like this.
  32. FujiLove

    FujiLove

    Messages:
    2,688
    Edit My Images:
    No
    And on a slightly cheerier note, a few from Iceland in May.
    Xpan, TMax 400, Xtol(r) (because it's no good unless it has an 'x' in it apparently).



    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]



    [​IMG]
     
  33. Fraser Euan White

    Fraser Euan White

    Messages:
    628
    Name:
    Fraser White
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I do like the Xpan format :)
     
  34. gazmorton2000

    gazmorton2000

    Messages:
    4,046
    Name:
    Gareth (Not Gary!)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    So sad, but a lovely photo.

    Also love the XPan format! Wish I had mine in Iceland. The third here is lovely.




    If you have seen some of the images I have shared over a few years, you will have seen I have worked with a few models. I recently decided that I was no longer going to pursue this so last month I did what's going to be my last model shoot for the foreseeable. I travelled to London to shoot with Alice. We had a very limited, basic space indoors and I also wanted to keep her fully clothed, not resorting to the quick wins that I may have been guilty of in the past and I see a lot of other photographers doing. Anyways, here's one of the images from that shoot that I am fairly happy with. :)

    Contax 645 + Kodak Portra 400.

    [​IMG]
     
    raathistle, Hallsy, gunnar and 7 others like this.
  35. Sir SR

    Sir SR

    Messages:
    5,789
    Name:
    Shaheed
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Love that
     
  36. FujiLove

    FujiLove

    Messages:
    2,688
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Thanks Gareth.

    Love the portrait. You've captured a very interesting expression, which seems somewhere between quizzical and aggressive. Perhaps that's what happens when you tell a model you're not interested in seeing them naked? :D
     
  37. sirch

    sirch Official Forum Numpty 2015

    Messages:
    6,614
    Name:
    Chris
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    :agree: very engaging, love it
     
  38. Sir SR

    Sir SR

    Messages:
    5,789
    Name:
    Shaheed
    Edit My Images:
    No
  39. gazmorton2000

    gazmorton2000

    Messages:
    4,046
    Name:
    Gareth (Not Gary!)
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Thank you. :) Carmencita Lab shared this yesterday and it's amassed a lot of digital hearts over on Instagram. Ha.
     
  40. Slyelessar

    Slyelessar

    Messages:
    636
    Name:
    Slyelessar
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    sirch, Hallsy, Sir SR and 2 others like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice