So wait, is it there or isn’t it? I’m confused
Oh dear, sorry Jonathan, I didn't mean to provoke such controversy. The original comment was provoked (in part) because I have rarely shot slide film without getting a magenta cast somewhere. I'm now learning that what I see may be significantly affected by an un-clibrated Mac screen.
I was also wondering what you get if you place the dropper on the bottom left hand corner of the image in #20642 (shaded part of white foam)?
Oh dear, sorry Jonathan, I didn't mean to provoke such controversy. The original comment was provoked (in part) because I have rarely shot slide film without getting a magenta cast somewhere. I'm now learning that what I see may be significantly affected by an un-clibrated Mac screen.
I was also wondering what you get if you place the dropper on the bottom left hand corner of the image in #20642 (shaded part of white foam)?
Meanwhile back in dudley. Olympus Omn1 35-70 F3.6 Kodak Pro-Image 100
Looking at the size of that bottle, and if I were involved, I think you'd need a high-speed camera for that!Need a series of 'shots' each one with more camera shake as the bottle gets emptier. [emoji6]
Some of my test shots from my "new" Ars Acon rangefinder camera. Dates from 1956/8 or so I am told. An excellent piece of kit.
This first one is a test of the rangefinder - focusing on the finial. Still in good adjustment after 60+ years.
View attachment 130602
View attachment 130603 View attachment 130605 View attachment 130604
Scans cover a multitude of sins but looking at the negatives, they are about the right density. Also says plenty about my trusty Leningrad meter.Looking good John - excellent results from an 'older' camera and a relief to know the rangefinder doesn't need adjusting. Exposures also look good so shutter must be accurate as well
First proper photos from the Rollei that I picked up from @Andysnap
Just a brief evening walk around the village as I get my knee back to full fitness... The last one is over sharpened (still getting used to scanning) but I'm pretty happy with them. Both will get entered into the village show under "Village Life"
Around The Village: WCC by Ian, on Flickr
Around The Village: St Mary's by Ian, on Flickr
Rolleiflex Automat, Ektar 100
And on a slightly cheerier note, a few from Iceland in May.
Xpan, TMax 400, Xtol(r) (because it's no good unless it has an 'x' in it apparently).
One of my favourite photos of our little girl who lost her fight with cancer last week. Devastated.
And on a slightly cheerier note, a few from Iceland in May.
Xpan, TMax 400, Xtol(r) (because it's no good unless it has an 'x' in it apparently).
So sad, but a lovely photo.
Also love the XPan format! Wish I had mine in Iceland. The third here is lovely.
If you have seen some of the images I have shared over a few years, you will have seen I have worked with a few models. I recently decided that I was no longer going to pursue this so last month I did what's going to be my last model shoot for the foreseeable. I travelled to London to shoot with Alice. We had a very limited, basic space indoors and I also wanted to keep her fully clothed, not resorting to the quick wins that I may have been guilty of in the past and I see a lot of other photographers doing. Anyways, here's one of the images from that shoot that I am fairly happy with.
Contax 645 + Kodak Portra 400.
So sad, but a lovely photo.
Also love the XPan format! Wish I had mine in Iceland. The third here is lovely.
Anyways, here's one of the images from that shoot that I am fairly happy with.
very engaging, love itLove that [emoji1474][emoji1474][emoji1474]
Love that [emoji1474][emoji1474][emoji1474]
Thanks Gareth.
Love the portrait. You've captured a very interesting expression, which seems somewhere between quizzical and aggressive. Perhaps that's what happens when you tell a model you're not interested in seeing them naked?
very engaging, love it