Guys
How long a turn around do you have in the uk to get a roll of film developed and scanned?
Mamiya C330S with the 105/3.5D lens which is outstanding, has such beautiful boker wide open and is very sharp. I am surprised how quickly I got used to that focal length
Ektar 100 self developed with the Tetenal Kit. Scanned in with a Coolscan 9000
Originals at https://www.flickr.com/photos/nico1974/
]
I usually develop my own but on the occasions I have used http://www.the-darkroom.co.uk/, if I post on day one, I get the images back on day 3.Guys
How long a turn around do you have in the uk to get a roll of film developed and scanned?
Well some Asda superstores do 35mm neg dev and scanned to CD for about £3...in about 35mins if not busy. But depending on the branch for the quality of results...anyway you can usually adjust in Photoshop if not covered in hairs or spots (again depends on the operators).
Snappy snaps will dev the film for £3 (depends on the branch) in 1 hour dunno what they charge for scanning...but cheapest to scan yourself.
I've found a good Asda but unfortunately it's 8 miles away but still I've finished a roll of film travelled to Adsa in 30mins got the film done in 30 mins, travelled back to home in 30 mins..so 90mins total is the fastest for me for results other than DIY.
I think the nearest Asda might be about 10,000 miles from Neil, Brian!
Yes, you can see the effect on the ground glass. Indeed you can study the ground glass in great detail using a loupe under a dark cloth. However my approach in this instance was more 'quick and dirty'. Nevertheless, I could definitely see the effect on the ground glass even though I didn't use a dark cloth.
I'm fairly sure I've overdone it somewhere along the lines... and I managed to fluff the taking and developing, meaning from two films, one had 8 shots instead of 10, the other had just 2.
Sounds like a regular film shooter to me...
I really like that
These are just excellent!Thank you for the lovely comments on my previous post.
35mm film this time.
Minolta CLE with Zeiss Biogon C 35/2.8 - Ektar 100 - Scanned with a Coolscan 9000 / Vuescan
The Minolta rangefinder is my favorite 35mm camera at the moment - small, light and with a fantastic viewfinder/rangefinder.
I am now using a separate bleach / fix when developing instead of Blix and the difference in the consistency of color in particular blue skies is significant. I used the developer from the Tetenal Kit here as it was still working well and the bleach/fix from the Fuji Hunt Kit.
Originals at https://www.flickr.com/photos/nico1974/
Another studio shot; Mamiya RZ67 and Ektar, home developed in the Fuji Hunt C41 kit:
Tulip remains by Kevin Allan, on Flickr
Thanks Andy. I have used Tetenal, Rollei Digibase, and now Fuji Hunt kits. The results seem to be more consistent with the Fuji Hunt kit but that might just be that my technique has become more consistent over time.I really like this Kevin and spookily I have a pot of tulips in an advanced state of decay that I am going to photograph at the weekend.
On a separate note, how do you find the fuji hunt kit. I currently use the tetanal colortec kit but fancy a try of something different.
Andy
Thanks Andy. I have used Tetenal, Rollei Digibase, and now Fuji Hunt kits. The results seem to be more consistent with the Fuji Hunt kit but that might just be that my technique has become more consistent over time.
Thanks Andy. I have used Tetenal, Rollei Digibase, and now Fuji Hunt kits. The results seem to be more consistent with the Fuji Hunt kit but that might just be that my technique has become more consistent over time.
I have just started using the Fuji Hunt Kit with the separate Bleach and Fixer instead of the combined Blix of the Tetenal Kit and have also noticed an improvement particularly in the consistency of blue skies which always tended to have a slightly muddy / yellow appearance and needed a bit of PP to get consistent. I was really surprised by the difference as I was not expecting it.
Love that Simon. Good contrast here.