Slimbert said:Finally going to get out of the house today with the camera.....it's not going well so far!!!
Lucky you, I haven't managed to get out or take a single frame yet.
Rico said:Lucky you, I haven't managed to get out or take a single frame yet.
Sonriendo said:I might be a bit stuffed, my ISO is 400 - look out for some well over exposure
High key
I might be a bit stuffed, my ISO is 400 - look out for some well over exposure
Yv said:Well I have managed several, with the advantage of being on holiday for a few days so have been out anyway and found stuff to point it at.
Mind you, on the way down here, we stopped very briefly at stone henge and just wandered along the fence to grab some pics with the disposable. There were several dslr users doing the same and making some very simple errors in their technique of trying to avoid the fence - but I couldn't bring myself to say anything nice to help them, I figured there was no way they were going to believe a woman who was waving a green throw away camera around and giggling a lot!
Well seeing as you can overexpose negative film about 3 stops before it starts being a problem, I don't think there will be any trouble!
Its underexposure where you have to be careful as it really crushes the blacks, increases grain and reduces dynamic range.
At least 3 have got parts of fingers in the frame, but I can't really blame the camera for that.
Byker28i said:Been out and shooting today. The viewfinder is weird, very distorted, so I'll be really interested to see how things come out.