The last of those certainly doesn't temp me at all, and if you could hold it in your hands your temptation to the others must have been limitedYesterday I hele in my bands.
X100V
X-Pro3
X-T4
GFX50R
GFX100
DROOL
but im not tempted, not at All
ngngngngn
Is buying something with the name "Kirk" a case of boldly going where no-one would have boldly gone before?A Kirk monopod head!
Is buying something with the name "Kirk" a case of boldly going where no-one would have boldly gone before?
I bought the RRS version many years ago when I was shooting football and I've never regretted it for a moment.Ha ha... it was recommended by two others..... 'make it so' seemed to be the best decision.
You cannot mix the species, it's immoralOne Nikon CL0913 to house my Canon EF Extender 25 & 12.
No doubt this will cause discomfort for some Canon & Nikon owners elsewhere
They're called mongrels.You cannot mix the species, it's immoral
That is a serious GAS condition right there.... a Nikon owner buying a Canon film camera because of a spare strap!Bargainous Canon EOS-1 HS, with a 'faulty' (only works in AF) 50mm f1.4 lens, which was also very cheap. Why? Well, someone on here was banging on about the EOS so I thought I'd better see what the fuss was about. Plus I had a Canon camera strap lying around that someone gave me, so thought I'd better buy a Canon camera to put on it. I'm still a Nikonite though...
That is a serious GAS condition right there.... a Nikon owner buying a Canon film camera because of a spare strap!
Trying quite hard to ignore my want (not a need, purely a want!) for an 80mm macro for my Fujis. Not a huge user of primes but a relatively (within the past 6 months or so) recent addition of a 4th body means that I have one spare to swap lenses on. Could equally be tempted by the Laowa (?) equivalent but I would prefer to keep AF if possible, especially since the body it would go on is an X-Pro with no dioptre adjustment and I swap between contact lenses and glasses so need it! (DA)
The Laowa macro lenses are excellent optically, if you can get passed having no AF. The 65mm version for Fuji mount is also a dinky little thing. If you only used it for macro and portraiture say, AF is a non issue really. It's worth it for the incredible output - no CA, practically zero distortion, sharp as you'd ever need at 2.8. It's also half the cost of the 80mm leaving you plenty over to look at other lenses/gear
Thanks for that, Keith. The problem is that I sometimes can't see the screen or E/OVF properly on the X-Pro1. I've usually got a pair of reading glasses with me but not always! I know that AF isn't ideal for Macro but it's better than guessing. I'll do more thinking and looking "after"...
I've been happy with my kit for the last couple of years but i have an event later in the year where i need to shoot kitesurfers & windsurfers.
Generally i don't shoot over 200mm, i drid try the 2xTC on my 200 f/2 but it wasnt long enough & turned a good lens into a meh lens!
So without wanting to get my feet wet i'm kinda lusting after a Sigma 60-600mm Sports zoom
Also i'm feeling pulled by a Ricoh GR as a pocketable trinket