- Messages
- 3,356
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Mine is........Blurry rushing water.
It only works for me if the blur is the absolute minimum.
It only works for me if the blur is the absolute minimum.
Mine is........Blurry rushing water.
It only works for me if the blur is the absolute minimum.
Thought I'd best quote it in case you withdraw it.
I don't really have a pet hate about in photographs. What I dislike are the sycophantic comments you get on Flickr about some decidedly average photos.
not so much the photograph, but when others add comments without first finding out what the photographers objective was.
things like you havent got it on the golden spot or crop much of the right out etc.
find out what the photographer had in mind then add criticism on the final picture.
lack of forethought. (I've been guilty of it often enough )
Lovin No 7 Wail!
out of focus eyes especially when ISO 2000 is used as the reason
People who are so far up their own arse they can fart and burp through the same hole
A great HDR, blurred water, baby, nude, Wedding shot is always going to be a great shot
Sometimes I think you only post things to wind people up...but having read all of that thread, I have to applaud this one...
I'd agree with that! Although I didn't think babies were allowed to get married, naked or not, where the blurry water would come from I don't know, and I'm not sure you'd want to HDR all of that lot.
:Damn!!! That's my party-trick for the Lake's weekend blown then
DD
What I dislike are the sycophantic comments you get on Flickr about some decidedly average photos.
Mine is........Blurry rushing water.