Hey Michael, I like the fragile set..... Especially the way the 3 go up in frame as you go along them. I'm wondering if it wouldn't look stronger as a piece if you toned down the blue slightly on the first photo, then applied to to the others so they were all on a cool tone? Either way, fits the theme well I think!
Like it. Quite a dramatic take on the theme. Not sure about the blue on the left, first thing I thought was your were dead
I did a high contrast B&w conversation and quite liked it.
Cheers.
I like it, its a slightly different take on the fragile, nice triptych
I think the leftmost image would do the job on it's own too. Powerful stuff.
Good idea for the triptych. I agree with the comments about the blueness of the left hand image and I'm with Andy on trying a real gritty mono conversion
Liking that a lot Michael, that is very different from you compared to your most recent ones, as well as the height change in each shot I think the colour change works very well too, also I feel it doesn't look staged at all - NICE ONE :Thumbs:
Wow Michael - that's a very gritty triptych. I really like the three images which work well together as a trio. Very powerful, perfectly on theme and - for me - one of your strongest images yet (including last year's 52!)
Super stuff
Beethoven was deaf.
Michael you're a talented image maker.
Very powerful. For me the far right embodies the theme perfectly.
Hi Michael,
I'm loving little Peekaboo, if it's anything like mu sons Blankie I can see the link to the theme. Although the shadow across the front is a little harsh, maybe some softer lighting/ editing would work better for the theme?
Fragile, I like the idea and the triptych works well. The blue tone to the first image is a tad strong for me. Also have you considered adding a little drop shadow to the three images? I find that helps bring a further depth to a triptych.
Fragile - a very good dramatic take for the theme, great work well done.
I know the area well
The tree maybe a little central in the frame, but I quite like the starkness of that one
I also like the way the snow dusted tracks lead your eyes all the way to the "Beacon" and beyond.
Nice pair Michael
wooo ... love the silhouettiness of #1
Hi Michael, it has to be the second one for me. Have you cloned out something on the horizon on the tree shot? There are areas that look like they've been missed and you can see where you cloned in a straight line as there's lines in triplicate on the RHS. Also small chunks missing out of the tree trunk.
On the second one I like the lead on line from the snowy tracks. Maybe crop a little of the sky off to give a panoramic feel?
Hi, Michael, both need a little crop off the bottom for me and as pointed out above the cloning in the first is a little odd
Hi Michael ....love the starkness of first one, great choice in the B&W.
The cloning on the edit of the first image is still a little off and patchy at the bottom, The second image looks ok to me .
Hi Micheal, what software are you using? I think the issue is your brush sides is too solid, maybe feather it and take samples from slightly different places to break up the cloning. If you're using photoshop (CS 5 or higher) zoom in to pixel level, circle a little bit iof what you want removing with the lasso tool, hit shift F5 and fill with content aware, then CTRL to deselect and go round another area.
Hi Michael
mono works well in the 1st with the edited version being slightly better as the odd bits along the horizon ( chequer board effect) gone. I get the feeling you may be using a hard edged brush for cloning which gives the "spot" effect ? A soft edge brush I find works better but it's still trial & error sometimes I wonder about cropping a little from the bottom ?
The 2nd , apart from the snowy tracks doesn't really work for me , not enough going on....but then ,I' still learning about landscapes
Mono shot for me.
The mono lone tree/benches is a great one Michael
No idea at all how I did not spot that when we were there
Hi Michael, I too like the first image. The only thing for me is that the tree branches and the bench are a bit too tight / close together... at least that's how it feels to me. I like the processing/tonal range. I wonder if being up the bank a bit more and shooting flat land at a slightly different angle might help? Not sure...
Nice take though and a very effective image!
Companions, I wondered if Monkeh would make an appearance
Elegant, not totally sure this fits the theme Michael but its certainly topical(ish)
Michael....
Companions - My first thought was: Munkeh!!! I so want one Then I just got incredibly jealous that you have MORE than one They do fit the theme well.
Elegant - I can see where you're thinking comes from, but I have to agree with Chris (although I guess if you're a train buff, it might be a VERY elegant carriage!)
Hi Michael
Companions ... I like #3 ... the five of them.
Elegant ... Hmmm ... not Churchill, but what's that olde first class train carriage? Yes.